Cited by 217Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesNuclear physics research studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reaction Rate Uncertainties and the Production of 19 F in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

Open access

Abstract

We present nucleosynthesis calculations and the resulting 19 F stellar yields for a large set of models with different masses and metallicity. During the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase, 19 F is produced as a consequence of nucleosynthesis occurring during the convective thermal pulses and also during the interpulse periods if protons from the envelope are partially mixed in the top layers of the He intershell (partial mixing zone). We find that the production of fluorine depends on the temperature of the convective pulses, the amount of primary 12 C mixed into the envelope by third dredge-up, and the extent of the partial mixing zone. Then we perform a detailed analysis of the reaction rates involved in the production of 19 F and the effects of their uncertainties. We find that the major uncertainties are associated with the 14 C(α, γ) 18 O and 19 F(α, p ) 22 Ne reaction rates. For these two reactions we present new estimates of the rates and their uncertainties. In both cases the revised rates are lower than previous estimates. The effect of the inclusion of the partial mixing zone on the production of fluorine strongly depends on the very uncertain 14 C(α, γ) 18 O reaction rate. The importance of the partial mixing zone is reduced when using our estimate for this rate. Overall, rate uncertainties result in uncertainties in the fluorine production of about 50% in stellar models with mass ≃3 M ☉ and of about a factor of 7 in stellar models of mass ≃5 M ☉ . This larger effect at high masses is due to the high uncertainties of the 19 F(α, p ) 22 Ne reaction rate. Taking into account both the uncertainties related to the partial mixing zone and those related to nuclear reactions, the highest values of 19 F enhancements observed in AGB stars are not matched by the models. This is a problem that will have to be revised by providing a better understanding of the formation and nucleosynthesis in the partial mixing zone, as well as in relation to reducing the uncertainties of the 14 C(α, γ) 18 O reaction rate. At the same time, the possible effect of cool bottom processing at the base of the convective envelope should be included in the computation of AGB nucleosynthesis. This process could, in principle, help to match the highest 19 F abundances observed by decreasing the C/O ratio at the surface of the star, while leaving the 19 F abundance unchanged.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/424559

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluorine is produced through a complex series of reactions; the main pathway involves production of 15N which is burnt to 19F via 15N(α,γ)19F.

    “Fluorine is produced through a complex series of reactions as outlined in detail by Forestini et al. (1992), Mowlavi, Jorissen, & Arnould (1996), Mowlavi, Jorissen, & Arnould (1998) and more recently by Lugaro et al. (2004). The main reaction pathway involves the production of 15 Nwhich is burnt to 19 F via 15 N( α , γ ) 19 F.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. 10.1086/342924 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00030-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0092-640X(87)90011-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/191669 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2642 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/165952 · DOI
  8. Cannon R. C., 1993, MNRAS, 263, 817, 10.1093/mnras/263.4.817 · DOI
  9. Caughlan, G. R. & Fowler, W. A. 1988, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 40, 283 (CF88) · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0375-9474(93)90242-P · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0375-9474(88)90622-7 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0375-9474(86)90384-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/309744 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1086/377023 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevC.24.476 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.025801 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevC.48.2057 · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06284.x · DOI
  19. Denker, A., etal 1995, in AIP Conf. Proc. 327, Nuclei in the Cosmos III, ed. M. Busso, R. Gallino, & C. M. Raiteri (New York: AIP), 255
  20. 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00455-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevC.55.3149 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevC.31.2274 · DOI
  23. 10.1086/173119 · DOI
  24. 10.1086/176219 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90598-G · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0375-9474(78)90611-5 · DOI
  27. 10.1051/aas:1997348 · DOI
  28. Forestini M., 1992, A&A, 261, 157
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.064305 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevC.18.255 · DOI
  31. 10.1086/178152 · DOI
  32. 10.1086/167775 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/305437 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90731-5 · DOI
  35. Gledenov, Yu. M., Salatski, V. I., Sedyshev, P. V., Sedysheva, M. V., Koehler, P. E., Vesna, V. A. & Okunev, I. S. 1995, in AIP Conf. Proc. 327, Nuclei in the Cosmos III, ed. M. Busso, R. Gallino, & C. M. Raiteri (New York: AIP), 173 · DOI
  36. Goriely S., 2000, A&A, 362, 599
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.055801 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90692-D · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90244-G · DOI
  40. Hammache, F., etal 1998, in Proc. of the Fifth International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos, ed. N. Prantzos & S. Harissopulos (Gif-sur-Yvette: Editions Frontieres), 373
  41. 10.1086/164453 · DOI
  42. Herwig F., 2000, A&A, 360, 952
  43. 10.1086/376726 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1086/185279 · DOI
  45. 10.1086/183916 · DOI
  46. 10.1086/187797 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.475 · DOI
  48. Iliadis C., 1990, Nucl. Phys. A, 512, 509, 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90084-Y · DOI
  49. Jorissen A., 1989, A&A, 221, 161
  50. 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00771-0 · DOI
  51. Jorissen A., 1992, A&A, 261, 164
  52. 10.1086/175004 · DOI
  53. Karakas, A. I. 2003, Ph.D. thesis, Monash Univ.
  54. 10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01622-1 · DOI
  55. 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.2724 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90154-6 · DOI
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1138 · DOI
  58. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.062501 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/0031-8914(65)90129-1 · DOI
  60. Landre V., 1990, A&A, 240, 85
  61. Langer N., 1999, A&A, 346, L37
  62. 10.1086/164810 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/0375-9474(79)90505-0 · DOI
  64. 10.1086/367887 · DOI
  65. 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.459 · DOI
  66. Mowlavi N., 1999, A&A, 344, 617
  67. Mowlavi N., 1996, A&A, 311, 803
  68. Mowlavi N., 1998, A&A, 334, 153
  69. 10.1086/344817 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00390-5 · DOI
  71. 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.458 · DOI
  72. 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1613 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/BF01419081 · DOI
  74. Renda, A., etal 2004, MNRAS in press
  75. 10.1103/PhysRev.86.527 · DOI
  76. 10.1103/PhysRevC.51.379 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00164-V · DOI
  78. 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90153-D · DOI
  79. 10.1103/PhysRevC.35.45 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/0375-9474(96)00084-X · DOI
  81. 10.1086/187767 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/0375-9474(88)90363-6 · DOI
  83. 10.1086/307571 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1086/319087 · DOI
  85. 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.2731 · DOI
  86. Utsumi, K. 1985, in Cool Stars with Excesses of Heavy Elements, ed. M. Jaschek & C. Keenan (Dordrecht: Reidel), 243 · DOI
  87. 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1945 · DOI
  89. 10.1086/190191 · DOI
  90. 10.1086/169348 · DOI
  91. 10.1086/160558 · DOI
  92. 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.065802 · DOI
  93. 10.1086/159032 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/0375-9474(79)90197-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lugaro, M., Ugalde, C., Karakas, A. I., Gorres, J., Wiescher, M., Lattanzio, J. C., & Cannon, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Saint Mary's University (CA)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-11-10
Volume
615
Issue
2
Pages
934-946
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2038080223
Cited by
217
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
  • Strong
  • Monash University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch stars, reaction rate uncertainties, third dredge-up, stellar yields, C/O ratio, helium shell, stellar mass dependence, metallicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review