The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reaction Rate Uncertainties and the Production of 19 F in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Open accessAbstract
We present nucleosynthesis calculations and the resulting 19 F stellar yields for a large set of models with different masses and metallicity. During the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase, 19 F is produced as a consequence of nucleosynthesis occurring during the convective thermal pulses and also during the interpulse periods if protons from the envelope are partially mixed in the top layers of the He intershell (partial mixing zone). We find that the production of fluorine depends on the temperature of the convective pulses, the amount of primary 12 C mixed into the envelope by third dredge-up, and the extent of the partial mixing zone. Then we perform a detailed analysis of the reaction rates involved in the production of 19 F and the effects of their uncertainties. We find that the major uncertainties are associated with the 14 C(α, γ) 18 O and 19 F(α, p ) 22 Ne reaction rates. For these two reactions we present new estimates of the rates and their uncertainties. In both cases the revised rates are lower than previous estimates. The effect of the inclusion of the partial mixing zone on the production of fluorine strongly depends on the very uncertain 14 C(α, γ) 18 O reaction rate. The importance of the partial mixing zone is reduced when using our estimate for this rate. Overall, rate uncertainties result in uncertainties in the fluorine production of about 50% in stellar models with mass ≃3 M ☉ and of about a factor of 7 in stellar models of mass ≃5 M ☉ . This larger effect at high masses is due to the high uncertainties of the 19 F(α, p ) 22 Ne reaction rate. Taking into account both the uncertainties related to the partial mixing zone and those related to nuclear reactions, the highest values of 19 F enhancements observed in AGB stars are not matched by the models. This is a problem that will have to be revised by providing a better understanding of the formation and nucleosynthesis in the partial mixing zone, as well as in relation to reducing the uncertainties of the 14 C(α, γ) 18 O reaction rate. At the same time, the possible effect of cool bottom processing at the base of the convective envelope should be included in the computation of AGB nucleosynthesis. This process could, in principle, help to match the highest 19 F abundances observed by decreasing the C/O ratio at the surface of the star, while leaving the 19 F abundance unchanged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluorine is produced through a complex series of reactions; the main pathway involves production of 15N which is burnt to 19F via 15N(α,γ)19F.
“Fluorine is produced through a complex series of reactions as outlined in detail by Forestini et al. (1992), Mowlavi, Jorissen, & Arnould (1996), Mowlavi, Jorissen, & Arnould (1998) and more recently by Lugaro et al. (2004). The main reaction pathway involves the production of 15 Nwhich is burnt to 19 F via 15 N( α , γ ) 19 F.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Lugaro et al. 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 94
- 10.1086/342924 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00030-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-640X(87)90011-8 · DOI
- 10.1086/191669 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2642 · DOI
- 10.1086/165952 · DOI
- Cannon R. C., 1993, MNRAS, 263, 817, 10.1093/mnras/263.4.817 · DOI
- Caughlan, G. R. & Fowler, W. A. 1988, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 40, 283 (CF88) · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(93)90242-P · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(88)90622-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(86)90384-2 · DOI
- 10.1086/309744 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/377023 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.24.476 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.025801 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.48.2057 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06284.x · DOI
- Denker, A., etal 1995, in AIP Conf. Proc. 327, Nuclei in the Cosmos III, ed. M. Busso, R. Gallino, & C. M. Raiteri (New York: AIP), 255
- 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00455-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.55.3149 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.31.2274 · DOI
- 10.1086/173119 · DOI
- 10.1086/176219 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90598-G · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(78)90611-5 · DOI
- 10.1051/aas:1997348 · DOI
- Forestini M., 1992, A&A, 261, 157
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.064305 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.18.255 · DOI
- 10.1086/178152 · DOI
- 10.1086/167775 · DOI
- 10.1086/305437 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90731-5 · DOI
- Gledenov, Yu. M., Salatski, V. I., Sedyshev, P. V., Sedysheva, M. V., Koehler, P. E., Vesna, V. A. & Okunev, I. S. 1995, in AIP Conf. Proc. 327, Nuclei in the Cosmos III, ed. M. Busso, R. Gallino, & C. M. Raiteri (New York: AIP), 173 · DOI
- Goriely S., 2000, A&A, 362, 599
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.055801 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90692-D · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90244-G · DOI
- Hammache, F., etal 1998, in Proc. of the Fifth International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos, ed. N. Prantzos & S. Harissopulos (Gif-sur-Yvette: Editions Frontieres), 373
- 10.1086/164453 · DOI
- Herwig F., 2000, A&A, 360, 952
- 10.1086/376726 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/185279 · DOI
- 10.1086/183916 · DOI
- 10.1086/187797 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.475 · DOI
- Iliadis C., 1990, Nucl. Phys. A, 512, 509, 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90084-Y · DOI
- Jorissen A., 1989, A&A, 221, 161
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00771-0 · DOI
- Jorissen A., 1992, A&A, 261, 164
- 10.1086/175004 · DOI
- Karakas, A. I. 2003, Ph.D. thesis, Monash Univ.
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01622-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.2724 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90154-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1138 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.062501 · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-8914(65)90129-1 · DOI
- Landre V., 1990, A&A, 240, 85
- Langer N., 1999, A&A, 346, L37
- 10.1086/164810 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(79)90505-0 · DOI
- 10.1086/367887 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.459 · DOI
- Mowlavi N., 1999, A&A, 344, 617
- Mowlavi N., 1996, A&A, 311, 803
- Mowlavi N., 1998, A&A, 334, 153
- 10.1086/344817 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00390-5 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.458 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1613 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01419081 · DOI
- Renda, A., etal 2004, MNRAS in press
- 10.1103/PhysRev.86.527 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.51.379 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00164-V · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90153-D · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.35.45 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(96)00084-X · DOI
- 10.1086/187767 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(88)90363-6 · DOI
- 10.1086/307571 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/319087 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.2731 · DOI
- Utsumi, K. 1985, in Cool Stars with Excesses of Heavy Elements, ed. M. Jaschek & C. Keenan (Dordrecht: Reidel), 243 · DOI
- 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1945 · DOI
- 10.1086/190191 · DOI
- 10.1086/169348 · DOI
- 10.1086/160558 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.065802 · DOI
- 10.1086/159032 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(79)90197-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“For further details on our method for introducing 13C pockets we refer to Lugaro et al. (2004), Karakas (2010), Karakas et al. (2007), and Kamath et al. (2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as07021 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lugaro, M., Ugalde, C., Karakas, A. I., Gorres, J., Wiescher, M., Lattanzio, J. C., & Cannon, R. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Saint Mary's University (CA)
- Monash University (AU)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-11-10
- Volume
- 615
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 934-946
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2038080223
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Nova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
- Strong
- Monash University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- asymptotic giant branch stars, reaction rate uncertainties, third dredge-up, stellar yields, C/O ratio, helium shell, stellar mass dependence, metallicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review