Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Pertussis Vaccination Strategies beyond Infancy: Recommendations by the Global Pertussis Initiative

Forsyth, K. D., Campins-Marti, M., Caro, J., Cherry, J. D., Greenberg, D., Guiso, N., Heininger, U., Schellekens, J., Tan, T., von Konig Carl-Heinz, W., Plotkin, S., for the Global Pertussis Initiative·2004·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Global Pertussis Initiative, an expert scientific forum, was established to address the ongoing problems associated with pertussis disease worldwide. METHODS: The group analyzed pertussis disease trends, developed recommendations to improve disease control through expanded vaccination strategies, and proposed solutions to barriers to implementation and support of research activities. RESULTS: Bordetella pertussis infection is endemic and continues to be a serious problem among unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated infants. In addition, the reported incidence of pertussis disease is increasing in adolescents and adults, who not only experience a considerable health burden themselves but also infect vulnerable infants. CONCLUSIONS: Current vaccination strategies need to be reinforced. Expanded vaccination should include adding booster doses to existing childhood schedules (preschool or adolescent) and booster doses for those specific adult subgroups that have the highest risk of transmitting B. pertussis infection to infants (i.e., new parents, other contacts of newborns, and health care workers). More epidemiological studies and studies of disease transmission and the cost-effectiveness of vaccination would be valuable, and surveillance, diagnostic improvements, and educational campaigns are needed for implementation. However, as a prelude to universal adult vaccination, immediate universal adolescent vaccination should be instituted in countries in which it is economically feasible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/426020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Forsyth, K. D., Campins-Marti, M., Caro, J., Cherry, J. D., Greenberg, D., Guiso, N., Heininger, U., Schellekens, J., Tan, T., von Konig Carl-Heinz, W., Plotkin, S., & Initiative, F. T. G. P.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-12-15
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
1802-1809
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2152139919
Cited by
173
References
1
FWCI
16.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Pertussis Vaccination Strategies beyond Infancy: Recommendations by the Global Pertussis Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/426020
The paper
Forsyth, K. D., Campins-Marti, M., Caro, J., Cherry, J. D., Greenberg, D., Guiso, N., Heininger, U., Schellekens, J., Tan, T., von Konig Carl-Heinz, W., Plotkin, S., & Initiative, F. T. G. P. (2004). New Pertussis Vaccination Strategies beyond Infancy: Recommendations by the Global Pertussis Initiative. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/426020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.