The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Pertussis Vaccination Strategies beyond Infancy: Recommendations by the Global Pertussis Initiative
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Global Pertussis Initiative, an expert scientific forum, was established to address the ongoing problems associated with pertussis disease worldwide. METHODS: The group analyzed pertussis disease trends, developed recommendations to improve disease control through expanded vaccination strategies, and proposed solutions to barriers to implementation and support of research activities. RESULTS: Bordetella pertussis infection is endemic and continues to be a serious problem among unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated infants. In addition, the reported incidence of pertussis disease is increasing in adolescents and adults, who not only experience a considerable health burden themselves but also infect vulnerable infants. CONCLUSIONS: Current vaccination strategies need to be reinforced. Expanded vaccination should include adding booster doses to existing childhood schedules (preschool or adolescent) and booster doses for those specific adult subgroups that have the highest risk of transmitting B. pertussis infection to infants (i.e., new parents, other contacts of newborns, and health care workers). More epidemiological studies and studies of disease transmission and the cost-effectiveness of vaccination would be valuable, and surveillance, diagnostic improvements, and educational campaigns are needed for implementation. However, as a prelude to universal adult vaccination, immediate universal adolescent vaccination should be instituted in countries in which it is economically feasible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deaths from pertussis are underestimated in England
Crowcroft, N. S. (2002) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.86.5.336 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Vaccines: past, present and future
Plotkin, S. A. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1209 · Cited by 592
Self-citationRecent developments in pertussis
Crowcroft, N. S., & Pebody, R. G. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68848-x · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Forsyth, K. D., Campins-Marti, M., Caro, J., Cherry, J. D., Greenberg, D., Guiso, N., Heininger, U., Schellekens, J., Tan, T., von Konig Carl-Heinz, W., Plotkin, S., & Initiative, F. T. G. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12-15
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1802-1809
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2152139919
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Pertussis Vaccination Strategies beyond Infancy: Recommendations by the Global Pertussis Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/426020
- The paper
- Forsyth, K. D., Campins-Marti, M., Caro, J., Cherry, J. D., Greenberg, D., Guiso, N., Heininger, U., Schellekens, J., Tan, T., von Konig Carl-Heinz, W., Plotkin, S., & Initiative, F. T. G. P. (2004). New Pertussis Vaccination Strategies beyond Infancy: Recommendations by the Global Pertussis Initiative. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/426020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.