Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infections Due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans in Transplant Recipients: Clinical Characteristics and Impact of Antifungal Agent Therapy on Outcome

Husain, S., Munoz, P., Forrest, G., Alexander, B. D., Somani, J., Brennan, K., Wagener, M. M., Singh, N.·2005·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unique characteristics, impact of therapy with antifungal agents, and outcome of infections with Scedosporium species were assessed in transplant recipients. METHODS: The patients comprised a total of 80 transplant recipients with Scedosporium infections, including 13 patients from our institutions (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center [Pittsburgh, PA], University of Maryland [Baltimore], Duke University Medical Center [Durham, NC], Emory University [Atlanta, GA], and Hospital Gregorio Maranon [Madrid, Spain]) and 67 reported in the literature. The transplant recipients were compared with 190 non-transplant recipients with scedosporiosis who were described in the literature. RESULTS: Overall, 69% of the infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients and 53% of the infections in organ transplant recipients were disseminated. HSCT recipients, compared with organ transplant recipients, were more likely to have infections caused by Scedosporium prolificans (P=.045), to have an earlier onset of infection (P=.007), to be neutropenic (P<.0001), and to have fungemia (P=.04). Time elapsed from transplantation to Scedosporium infection in transplant recipients has increased in recent years (P=.002). The mortality rate among transplant recipients with scedosporiosis was 58%. In a logistic regression model using amphotericin B as comparison treatment, voriconazole was associated with a trend towards better survival (odds ratio [OR], 10.40; P=.08). Presence of disseminated infection (OR, 0.20; P=.03) predicted lower survival, and receipt of adjunctive surgery as treatment (OR, 5.52; P=.02) independently predicted a better survival in this model. CONCLUSIONS: Scedosporium infections in transplant recipients were associated with a high rate of dissemination and a poor outcome overall. The use of newer triazole agents warrants consideration as a therapeutic modality for these infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/426445

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 163 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Husain, S., Munoz, P., Forrest, G., Alexander, B. D., Somani, J., Brennan, K., Wagener, M. M., & Singh, N.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2005-01-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
89-99
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2149921692
Cited by
401
References
163
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infections Due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans in Transplant Recipients: Clinical Characteristics and Impact of Antifungal Agent Therapy on Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/426445
The paper
Husain, S., Munoz, P., Forrest, G., Alexander, B. D., Somani, J., Brennan, K., Wagener, M. M., & Singh, N. (2005). Infections Due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans in Transplant Recipients: Clinical Characteristics and Impact of Antifungal Agent Therapy on Outcome. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/426445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.