The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Spatial Clustering of Star‐forming Galaxies at Redshifts 1.4 ≲z≲ 3.5
Open accessAbstract
We analyzed the spatial distribution of 28,500 photometrically selected galaxies with magnitude 23.5 < AB < 25.5 and redshift 1.4 < z < 3.5 in 21 fields with a total area of 0.81 deg 2 . The galaxies were divided into three subsamples, with mean redshifts = 1.7, 2.2, and 2.9, according to their U n G colors. Combining the galaxies' measured angular clustering with redshift distributions inferred from 1600 spectroscopic redshifts, we find comoving correlation lengths at the three redshifts of r 0 = 4.5 ± 0.6, 4.2 ± 0.5, and 4.0 ± 0.6 h -1 Mpc, respectively, and infer a roughly constant correlation function slope of γ = 1.6 ± 0.1. We derive similar numbers from the 1600 object spectroscopic sample itself with a new statistic, K , that is insensitive to many possible systematics. Galaxies that are bright in (λ rest ~ 1500-2500 Å) cluster more strongly than fainter galaxies at z = 2.9 and 2.2 but not, apparently, at z = 1.7. Comparison to a numerical simulation that is consistent with recent WMAP observations suggests that galaxies in our samples are associated with dark matter halos of mass 10 11.2 -10 11.8 ( z = 2.9), 10 11.8 -10 12.2 ( z = 2.2), and 10 11.9 -10 12.3 M ☉ ( z = 1.7) and that a small fraction of the halos contain more than one galaxy that satisfies our selection criteria. Adding recent observations of galaxy clustering at z ~ 0 and ~1 to the simulation results, we conclude that the typical object in our samples will evolve into an elliptical galaxy by redshift z = 0 and will already have an early-type spectrum by redshift z = 1. We comment briefly on the implied relationship between galaxies in our survey and those selected with other techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Budavari, T., Connolly, A. J., Szalay, A. S., Szapudi, I., Csabai, I., Scranton, R., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., Eisenstein, D. J., Frieman, J. A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/377168 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Reddy, N. A., & Steidel, C. C. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/1/778 · Cited by 555
Self-citationClustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., Hennawi, J. F., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Szalay, A. S., et al. (2007) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/513517 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Adelberger, K. L., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., & Erb, D. K.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 619
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 697-713
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2017047032
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Spatial Clustering of Star‐forming Galaxies at Redshifts 1.4 ≲z≲ 3.5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/426580
- The paper
- Adelberger, K. L., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., & Erb, D. K. (2005). The Spatial Clustering of Star‐forming Galaxies at Redshifts 1.4 ≲z≲ 3.5. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/426580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.