Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Open access
Shen, Yue, Strauss, Michael A., Oguri, Masamune, Hennawi, Joseph F., Fan, Xiaohui, Richards, Gordon T., Hall, Patrick B., Gunn, James E., Schneider, Donald P., Szalay, Alexander S., Thakar, Anirudda R., Vanden Berk, Daniel E., Anderson, Scott F., Bahcall, Neta A., Connolly, Andrew J., Knapp, Gillian R.·2007·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We study the two-point correlation function of a uniformly selected sample of 4426 luminous optical quasars with redshift 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 5.4 selected over 4041 deg 2 from the Fifth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We fit a power-law to the projected correlation function w p ( r p ) to marginalize over redshift-space distortions and redshift errors. For a real-space correlation function of the form ξ( r ) = ( r / r 0 ) -γ , the fitted parameters in comoving coordinates are r 0 = 15.2 ± 2.7 h -1 Mpc and γ = 2.0 ± 0.3, over a scale range 4 h -1 Mpc ≤ r p ≤ 150 h -1 Mpc. Thus high-redshift quasars are appreciably more strongly clustered than their z ≈ 1.5 counterparts, which have a comoving clustering length r 0 ≈ 6.5 h -1 Mpc. Dividing our sample into two redshift bins, 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 3.5 and z ≥ 3.5, and assuming a power-law index γ = 2.0, we find a correlation length of r 0 = 16.9 ± 1.7 h -1 Mpc for the former and r 0 = 24.3 ± 2.4 h -1 Mpc for the latter. Strong clustering at high redshift indicates that quasars are found in very massive, and therefore highly biased, halos. Following Martini & Weinberg, we relate the clustering strength and quasar number density to the quasar lifetimes and duty cycle. Using the Sheth & Tormen halo mass function, the quasar lifetime is estimated to lie in the range ∼4-50 Myr for quasars with 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 3.5, and ∼30-600 Myr for quasars with z ≥ 3.5. The corresponding duty cycles are ∼0.004-0.05 for the lower redshift bin and ∼0.03-0.6 for the higher redshift bin. The minimum mass of halos in which these quasars reside is (2-3) × 10 12 h -1 M ⊙ for quasars with 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 3.5 and (4-6) × 10 12 h -1 M ⊙ for quasars with z ≥ 3.5; the effective bias factor b eff increases with redshift, e.g., b eff ∼ 8 at z = 3.0 and b eff ∼ 16 at z = 4.5.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/513517

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 101 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., Hennawi, J. F., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Szalay, A. S., Thakar, A. R., Vanden Berk, D. E., Anderson, S. F., Bahcall, N. A., Connolly, A. J., & Knapp, G. R.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2007-04-03
Volume
133
Issue
5
Pages
2222-2241
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2082727428
Cited by
384
References
101
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/513517
The paper
Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., Hennawi, J. F., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Szalay, A. S., Thakar, A. R., Vanden Berk, D. E., Anderson, S. F., Bahcall, N. A., Connolly, A. J., & Knapp, G. R. (2007). Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/513517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.