The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Open accessAbstract
We study the two-point correlation function of a uniformly selected sample of 4426 luminous optical quasars with redshift 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 5.4 selected over 4041 deg 2 from the Fifth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We fit a power-law to the projected correlation function w p ( r p ) to marginalize over redshift-space distortions and redshift errors. For a real-space correlation function of the form ξ( r ) = ( r / r 0 ) -γ , the fitted parameters in comoving coordinates are r 0 = 15.2 ± 2.7 h -1 Mpc and γ = 2.0 ± 0.3, over a scale range 4 h -1 Mpc ≤ r p ≤ 150 h -1 Mpc. Thus high-redshift quasars are appreciably more strongly clustered than their z ≈ 1.5 counterparts, which have a comoving clustering length r 0 ≈ 6.5 h -1 Mpc. Dividing our sample into two redshift bins, 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 3.5 and z ≥ 3.5, and assuming a power-law index γ = 2.0, we find a correlation length of r 0 = 16.9 ± 1.7 h -1 Mpc for the former and r 0 = 24.3 ± 2.4 h -1 Mpc for the latter. Strong clustering at high redshift indicates that quasars are found in very massive, and therefore highly biased, halos. Following Martini & Weinberg, we relate the clustering strength and quasar number density to the quasar lifetimes and duty cycle. Using the Sheth & Tormen halo mass function, the quasar lifetime is estimated to lie in the range ∼4-50 Myr for quasars with 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 3.5, and ∼30-600 Myr for quasars with z ≥ 3.5. The corresponding duty cycles are ∼0.004-0.05 for the lower redshift bin and ∼0.03-0.6 for the higher redshift bin. The minimum mass of halos in which these quasars reside is (2-3) × 10 12 h -1 M ⊙ for quasars with 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 3.5 and (4-6) × 10 12 h -1 M ⊙ for quasars with z ≥ 3.5; the effective bias factor b eff increases with redshift, e.g., b eff ∼ 8 at z = 3.0 and b eff ∼ 16 at z = 4.5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., Bakken, J. A., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 10,366
Self-citationA Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical ClusteringPreprint
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · Cited by 6,275
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation
Press, W. H., & Schechter, P. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152650 · Cited by 4,916
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
Self-citationThe Demography of Massive Dark Objects in Galaxy Centers
Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Gebhardt, K., Green, R., Grillmair, C., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300353 · Cited by 4,007
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
Self-citation
Cited by
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Improved redshifts for SDSS quasar spectra: Improved SDSS redshifts
Hewett, P. C., & Wild, V. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16648.x · Cited by 272
Constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity from 800 000 Photometric Quasars
Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., & Roth, N. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.221301 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., Hennawi, J. F., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Szalay, A. S., Thakar, A. R., Vanden Berk, D. E., Anderson, S. F., Bahcall, N. A., Connolly, A. J., & Knapp, G. R.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-04-03
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2222-2241
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2082727428
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 22.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/513517
- The paper
- Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., Hennawi, J. F., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Szalay, A. S., Thakar, A. R., Vanden Berk, D. E., Anderson, S. F., Bahcall, N. A., Connolly, A. J., & Knapp, G. R. (2007). Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/513517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.