The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Essence of Quintessence and the Cost of Compression
Open accessAbstract
Standard two-parameter compressions of the infinite dimensional dark energy model space show crippling limitations even with current Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) data unless strong priors are imposed. First, they cannot cope with rapid evolution—our best fit to the latest SN Ia data shows late and very rapid evolution to w 0 = -2.85. However, all of the standard parameterizations (incorrectly) claim that this best fit is ruled out at more than 2 σ primarily because they track it well only at very low redshift, z ≤ 0.2. Furthermore, they incorrectly rule out the observationally compatible region w ≪ -1 for z > 1. Second, the parameterizations give wildly different estimates for the redshift of acceleration, which vary from z acc = 0.14 to z acc = 0.59. Although these failings are largely cured by including higher order terms (≥3 parameters), this results in new degeneracies and opens up large regions of previously ruled out parameter space. All of this casts serious doubt on the usefulness of the standard two-parameter compressions in the coming era of high-precision dark energy cosmology and emphasizes the need for decorrelated compressions with at least three parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315 · cited 4×
“Using a simple linear expansion of the deceleration parameter q, Riess et al. (2004) estimated zacc = 0.46± 0.13.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
Cited by
FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., & Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2,734
Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
Trotta, R. (2008) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510802066753 · Cited by 1,253
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Self-citationSAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271806009704 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Bassett, B. A., Corasaniti, P. S., & Kunz, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-11-03
- Volume
- 617
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L1-L4
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2061881867
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Essence of Quintessence and the Cost of Compression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/427023
- The paper
- Bassett, B. A., Corasaniti, P. S., & Kunz, M. (2004). The Essence of Quintessence and the Cost of Compression. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/427023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.