The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gamma‐Ray Burst Early Afterglows: Reverse Shock Emission from an Arbitrarily Magnetized Ejecta
Open accessAbstract
Evidence suggests that gamma-ray burst (GRB) ejecta are likely magnetized, although the degree of magnetization is unknown. When such magnetized ejecta are decelerated by the ambient medium, the characteristics of the reverse shock emission are strongly influenced by the degree of magnetization. We derive a rigorous analytical solution for the relativistic 90° shocks under the ideal MHD condition. The solution is reduced to the Blandford-McKee hydrodynamical solution when the magnetization parameter σ approaches zero, and to the Kennel-Coroniti solution (which depends on σ only) when the shocks upstream and downstream are ultrarelativistic with respect to each other. Our generalized solution can be used to treat the more general cases, e.g., when the shocks upstream and downstream are mildly relativistic with respect to each other. We find that the suppression factor of the shock in the strong magnetic field regime is only mild as long as the shock upstream is relativistic with respect to the downstream, and it saturates in the high-σ regime. This indicates that generally strong relativistic shocks still exist in the high-σ limit. This can effectively convert kinetic energy into heat. The overall efficiency of converting ejecta energy into heat, however, decreases with increasing σ, mainly because the fraction of the kinetic energy in the total energy decreases. We use the theory to study the reverse shock emission properties of arbitrarily magnetized ejecta in the GRB problem assuming a constant density of the circumburst medium. We study the shell-medium interaction in detail and categorize various critical radii for shell evolution. With typical GRB parameters, a reverse shock exists when σ is less than a few tens or a few hundreds. The shell evolution can still be categorized into the thick and thin shell regimes, but the separation between the two regimes now depends on the σ-parameter and the thick shell regime greatly shrinks at high σ. The thin shell regime can also be categorized into two subregions depending on whether the shell starts to spread during the first shock crossing. The early optical afterglow light curves are calculated for GRBs with a wide range of σ-value, with the main focus on the reverse shock component. We find that as σ increases from below, the reverse shock emission level increases steadily until reaching a peak at σ ≲ 1, then it decreases steadily when σ > 1. At large σ-values, the reverse shock peak is broadened in the thin shell regime because of the separation of the shock crossing radius and the deceleration radius. This novel feature can be regarded as a signature of high σ. The early afterglow data of GRB 990123 and GRB 021211 could be understood within the theoretical framework developed in this paper, with the inferred σ-value ≳0.1. The case of GRB 021004 and GRB 030418 may be also interpreted with higher σ-values, although more detailed modeling is needed. Early tight optical upper limits could be interpreted as very high σ cases, in which a reverse shock does not exist or is very weak. Our model predictions could be further tested against future abundant early afterglow data collected by the Swift UV-optical telescope, so that the magnetic content of GRB fireballs can be diagnosed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation
Fermi, E. (1949) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.75.1169 · Cited by 2,335
Collapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,328
Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows
Sari, R., Piran, T., & Narayan, R. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/311269 · Cited by 2,297
Particle acceleration at astrophysical shocks: A theory of cosmic ray origin
Blandford, R., & Eichler, D. (1987) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7 · Cited by 1,964
Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst AfterglowsPreprint
Sari, R., Piran, T., & Narayan, R. (1997) · Cited by 1,385
Unsteady outflow models for cosmological gamma-ray bursts
Rees, M. J., & Meszaros, P. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/187446 · Cited by 1,272
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Optical and Long‐Wavelength Afterglow from Gamma‐Ray Bursts
Meszaros, P., & Rees, M. J. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303625 · Cited by 1,192
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Self-citationMészáros, P. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093821 · Cited by 714
Cited by
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
“(3) Deceleration of a promptly ejected Poynting flux–dominated flow (e.g., Zhang & Kobayashi 2005) naturally gives a smooth injection signature observed.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationBroadband observations of the naked-eye γ-ray burst GRB 080319B
Racusin, J. L., Karpov, S. V., Sokolowski, M., Granot, J., Wu, X. F., Pal’shin, V., Covino, S., van der Horst, A. J., Oates, S. R., Schady, P., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07270 · Cited by 526
Self-citationA complete reference of the analytical synchrotron external shock models of gamma-ray bursts
Gao, H., Lei, W.-H., Zou, Y.-C., Wu, X.-F., & Zhang, B. (2013) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001 · Cited by 262
Self-citationLiang, E.-W., Yi, S.-X., Zhang, J., Lü, H.-J., Zhang, B.-B., & Zhang, B. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/725/2/2209 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., & Kobayashi, S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-07-20
- Volume
- 628
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 315-334
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2006915761
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gamma‐Ray Burst Early Afterglows: Reverse Shock Emission from an Arbitrarily Magnetized Ejecta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/429787
- The paper
- Zhang, B., & Kobayashi, S. (2005). Gamma‐Ray Burst Early Afterglows: Reverse Shock Emission from an Arbitrarily Magnetized Ejecta. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/429787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.