The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language
Open accessAbstract
The Pirah language challenges simplistic application of Hocketts nearly universally accepted design features of human language by showing that some of these features (interchangeability, displacement, and productivity) may be culturally constrained. In particular, Pirah culture constrains communication to nonabstract subjects which fall within the immediate experience of interlocutors. This constraint explains a number of very surprising features of Pirah grammar and culture: the absence of numbers of any kind or a concept of counting and of any terms for quantification, the absence of color terms, the absence of embedding, the simplest pronoun inventory known, the absence of relative tenses, the simplest kinship system yet documented, the absence of creation myths and fiction, the absence of any individual or collective memory of more than two generations past, the absence of drawing or other art and one of the simplest material cultures documented, and the fact that the Pirah are monolingual after more than 200 years of regular contact with Brazilians and the TupiGuaranispeaking Kawahiv.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · Cited by 5,189
Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition
TOMASELLO, M. (2005) · Harvard University Press · doi:10.2307/j.ctv26070v8 · Cited by 1,260
Cited by
The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001975 · Cited by 2,031
Creswell, J. D. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139 · Cited by 1,702
Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08003543 · Cited by 1,174
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x · Cited by 1,089
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Beyond WEIRD: towards a broad-based behavioral science
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000725 · Cited by 631
The faculty of language: what's special about it?
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 · Cited by 631
Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure
Kirby, S., Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016 · Cited by 557
The interface of language and theory of mind
de Villiers, J. (2007) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006 · Cited by 457
Kinship Categories Across Languages Reflect General Communicative Principles
Kemp, C., & Regier, T. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218811 · Cited by 284
Doris, J. M., & The Moral Psychology Research Group (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.001.0001 · Cited by 227
One model for the learning of language
Yang, Y., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2021865119 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Everett, D. L.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 621-646
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W2109592461
- Cited by
- 1,276
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.