CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 142Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Assessment and PedagogyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reliability of the Grading of High-School Work in English

Starch, Daniel, Elliott, Edward C.·1912·The School Review
DOI 10.1086/435971
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/435971

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Starch and Elliott (1912) found that grades on the same English paper varied from 50 to 98% between 142 teachers.

    “Starch and Elliott (1912) asked 142 teachers to grade the same English paper and found that grades on the paper varied from 50 to 98% between teachers.”

    From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Starch and Elliott, 1912

  • Starch and Elliott (1912) concluded that the promotion or retardation of a pupil depends to a considerable extent upon the subjective estimate of the teacher rather than upon the actual work produced.

    “the researchers concluded “the promotion or retardation of a pupil depends to a considerable extent upon the subjective estimate of his teacher” rather than upon the actual work produced by the student (Starch and Elliott, 1912).”

    From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Starch and Elliott, 1912

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Starch, D., & Elliott, E. C.
ORCID
Elliott, Edward C.
Venue
The School Review
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
1912-09
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
442-457
ISSN
0036-6773 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1086/435971
OpenAlex
W2088686590
Cited by
142
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
76.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The School Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
rating reliability, English grades, high school English, teacher judgment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review