Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Lyα Forest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Open access
McDonald, Patrick, Seljak, Uroš, Burles, Scott, Schlegel, David J., Weinberg, David H., Cen, Renyue, Shih, David, Schaye, Joop, Schneider, Donald P., Bahcall, Neta A., Briggs, John W., Brinkmann, J., Brunner, Robert J., Fukugita, Masataka, Gunn, James E., Ivezić, Željko, Kent, Stephen, Lupton, Robert H., Vanden Berk, Daniel E.·2006·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We measure the power spectrum, P F ( k , z ), of the transmitted flux in the Lyα forest using 3035 high-redshift quasar spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. This sample is almost 2 orders of magnitude larger than any previously available data set, yielding statistical errors of ~0.6% and ~0.005 on, respectively, the overall amplitude and logarithmic slope of P F ( k , z ). This unprecedented statistical power requires a correspondingly careful analysis of the data and of possible systematic contaminations in it. For this purpose we reanalyze the raw spectra to make use of information not preserved by the standard pipeline. We investigate the details of the noise in the data, resolution of the spectrograph, sky subtraction, quasar continuum, and metal absorption. We find that background sources such as metals contribute significantly to the total power and have to be subtracted properly. We also find clear evidence for Si III correlations with the Lyα forest and suggest a simple model to account for this contribution to the power. Our tests indicate that any residual systematics in the analysis are unlikely to affect the inference of cosmological parameters from P F ( k , z ). These results should provide an essential ingredient for all future attempts to constrain modeling of structure formation, cosmological parameters, and theories for the origin of primordial fluctuations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/444361

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
McDonald, P., Seljak, U., Burles, S., Schlegel, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Cen, R., Shih, D., Schaye, J., Schneider, D. P., Bahcall, N. A., Briggs, J. W., Brinkmann, J., Brunner, R. J., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Ivezić, Ž., Kent, S., Lupton, R. H., & Vanden Berk, D. E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2006-03
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
80-109
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W1482228350
Cited by
425
References
35
FWCI
17.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Lyα Forest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/444361
The paper
McDonald, P., Seljak, U., Burles, S., Schlegel, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Cen, R., Shih, D., Schaye, J., Schneider, D. P., Bahcall, N. A., Briggs, J. W., Brinkmann, J., Brunner, R. J., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Ivezić, Ž., Kent, S., Lupton, R. H., & Vanden Berk, D. E. (2006). The Lyα Forest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/444361

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.