The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Representing the Colonized: Anthropology's Interlocutors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How Native Is a “Native” Anthropologist?
Narayan, K. (1993) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1993.95.3.02a00070 · Cited by 1,333
Material culture after text: re‐membering things
Olsen, B. (2003) · Norwegian Archaeological Review · doi:10.1080/00293650310000650 · Cited by 279
Moser, S., Glazier, D., Phillips, J. E., el Nemr, L. N., Mousa, M. S., Aiesh, R. N., Richardson, S., Conner, A., & Seymour, M. (2002) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/0043824022000007071 · Cited by 245
Gramsci's concept of common sense: a useful concept for anthropologists?
Crehan, K. (2011) · Journal of Modern Italian Studies · doi:10.1080/1354571x.2011.542987 · Cited by 67
The perfect subject (postcolonial object studies)
Fowles, S. (2016) · Journal of Material Culture · doi:10.1177/1359183515623818 · Cited by 61
deGrassi, A. (2008) · African Studies Review · doi:10.1353/arw.0.0087 · Cited by 55
A Divided Community: The Ethics and Politics of Activist Research
Loperena, C. A. (2016) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/686301 · Cited by 30
‘We can see a savage’: a case study of the colonial gaze in generative AI algorithms
Alenichev, A., Shaffer, J. D., Kingori, P., Grietens, K. P., Muldoon, J., & Rocher, L. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02685-0 · Cited by 3
“Said (1989) argued that these representations of colonized peoples were essentially repressive because there was no real possibility for these people to intervene in the process and provide a more ‘participatory and collaborative’ way of developing representations.”
Ethnographic Refusal: Anthropological Need
(2014) · Mohawk Interruptus · doi:10.1215/9780822376781-004 · Cited by 3
Cabral, B. (2025) · Abolitionist Perspectives in Social Work · doi:10.52713/he1a0v47 · Cited by 3
Indigenous Interruptions: Mohawk Nationhood, Citizenship, and the State
(2014) · Mohawk Interruptus · doi:10.1215/9780822376781-001
Metadata
- Authors
- Said, E. W.
- Venue
- Critical Inquiry
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-225
- ISSN
- 0093-1896 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7858
- OpenAlex
- W2033296412
- Cited by
- 1,032
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 139.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
