The Economics of Bail Jumping
Abstract
WHY do some defendants, released on personal or property bond or cash bail, fail to appear for their scheduled trial or hearing? This question, considered in this paper, diverges somewhat from the kind of question typically posed within the context of the heated debate over bail reform in America. A frequent query raised in the debate has been: should the bail system be employed to assure appearance at trial or to prevent the defendant's commission of further crimes? Another question has been whether the poor, the disadvantaged, the uneducated, or the innocent are punished under a system of bail based on alternative measures of either ability to pay or presumption of guilt.Recently researchers have begun to address the problem of determinants of bond-forfeiture rates, bail risk, and failure to appear for trial. Paul Wice summarized evidence suggesting that cities that not only actively super vise pretrial release but also base releases on criteria related to a defendant's record of past appearances tend to experience lower rates of bond forfeiture. Stephen Clarke et al., who find demographic variables and characteristics of the offense to be insignificant determinants of combined failure to appear at trial and rearrest, observe nevertheless a strong posi tive correlation of court delay with bail risk. William Landes, finding characteristics of the offense a significant determinant of bail forfeiture, similarly observes a significant effect of the size of bond on bail risk.…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cash bail has been used in the US criminal justice system to deter defendants from failing to appear at their trials and to prevent them from committing additional crimes.
“Cash bail has been used in the US criminal justice system to deter defendants from failing to appear at their trials and to prevent them from committing additional crimes (DeWitt, 2019;Myers, 1981;Vargas, 2019).”
From A Scoping Review of the Relationships Between Cash Bail, Failure to Appear, Re-Arrest, Health and Well-Being, Race, and Gender (2026) · cites this paper as Myers, 1981
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20161503 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Does Cash Bail Deter Misconduct?
Ouss, A., & Stevenson, M. (2023) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20210349 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Scheadler, T. R., Radney, A., Smith, B. L., Munshi, A., & Cole, E. (2026) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-025-09860-5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Cash bail has been used in the US criminal justice system to deter defendants from failing to appear at their trials and to prevent them from committing additional crimes (DeWitt, 2019; Myers, 1981; Vargas, 2019 ).”
- Authors
- Myers
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Myers,, Samuel L.
- ORCID
- Myers,, Samuel L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Legal Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1981-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 381-396
- ISSN
- 0047-2530 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5366
- OpenAlex
- W2093563805
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Legal Studies (publishedVersion)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Keywords
- failure to appear, pretrial release, judicial delay, bail bonds, plea bargaining, expected utility, bail reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review