Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explicit Reasons for Implicit Contracts: The Legal Logic to the Japanese Main Bank System

Ramseyer, J. Mark·1995·The Japanese Main Bank System

Abstract

The Japanese main bank system is characterized by a nexus of implicit contracts. This chapter examines whether such unspoken agreements are really made, based on a comparison of Japanese and American banking systems. It is argued that if banks and firms want the arrangements stipulated by implicit contracts, then these should have been negotiated explicitly, and laid down in court-enforceable agreements. The fact that firms do not draft such agreements may indicate that they did not make them at all.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/0198288999.003.0007

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Ramseyer, J. M.
Venue
The Japanese Main Bank System
Published
1995-02-16
Pages
231-257
OpenAlex
W1569259624
Cited by
322
References
4
FWCI
55.93
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explicit Reasons for Implicit Contracts: The Legal Logic to the Japanese Main Bank System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0198288999.003.0007
The paper
Ramseyer, J. M. (1995). Explicit Reasons for Implicit Contracts: The Legal Logic to the Japanese Main Bank System. The Japanese Main Bank System. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198288999.003.0007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.