Cited by 162Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies

Engendering Reproductive Policy and Practice in Peasant China: For a Feminist Demography of Reproduction

Greenhalgh, Susan, Li, Jiali·1995·Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/495002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The public discourse on China's missing girls was profoundly male-centered and gender biased.

    “The public discourse on this most blatant outcome of the one-child policy, however, was profoundly male-centered and gender biased (Greenhalgh & Li 1995, Riley 1999, Greenhalgh 2013).”

    From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Greenhalgh & Li 1995

  • Scholarly studies of the one-child policy have focused on the suffering of women who long for additional children; are blamed by husbands and parents-in-law for giving birth to singleton daughters instead of sons; and face surveillance, gynecological exams, mandatory contraception, fines, and the loss of benefits or jobs.

    “Scholarly studies of the one-child policy have focused on the suffering of women who long for additional children; are blamed by husbands and parents-in-law for giving birth to singleton daughters instead of sons; and face surveillance, gynecological exams, mandatory contraception, fines, and the loss of benefits or jobs (Anagnost 1988(Anagnost , 1995;;Greenhalgh and Li 1995;Kaufman 1993;Wolf 1985”

    From China's One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters (2002) · cites this paper as Greenhalgh and Li 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenhalgh, S., & Li, J.
Venue
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
Published
1995-04
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
601-641
ISSN
  • 0097-9740 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6943
OpenAlex
W2020048540
Cited by
162
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
Keywords
reproductive policy, gender and reproduction, family planning, women's reproductive rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review