The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gemini Spectroscopy of Supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey: Improving High‐Redshift Supernova Selection and Classification
Open accessAbstract
We present new techniques for improving the efficiency of supernova (SN) classification at high redshift using 64 candidates observed at Gemini North and South during the first year of the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS). The SNLS is an ongoing 5 year project with the goal of measuring the equation of state of dark energy by discovering and following over 700 high-redshift SNe Ia using data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey. We achieve an improvement in the SN Ia spectroscopic confirmation rate: at Gemini 71% of candidates are now confirmed as SNe Ia, compared to 54% using the methods of previous surveys. This is despite the comparatively high redshift of this sample, in which the median SN Ia redshift is z = 0.81 (0.155 ≤ z ≤ 1.01). These improvements were realized because we use the unprecedented color coverage and light curve sampling of the SNLS to predict whether a candidate is a SN Ia and to estimate its redshift, before obtaining a spectrum, using a new technique called the "SN photo- z ." In addition, we have improved techniques for galaxy subtraction and SN template χ 2 fitting, allowing us to identify candidates even when they are only 15% as bright as the host galaxy. The largest impediment to SN identification is found to be host galaxy contamination of the spectrum—when the SN was at least as bright as the underlying host galaxy the target was identified more than 90% of the time. However, even SNe in bright host galaxies can be easily identified in good seeing conditions. When the image quality was better than 0 55, the candidate was identified 88% of the time. Over the 5 year course of the survey, using the selection techniques presented here, we will be able to add ~170 more confirmed SNe Ia than would be possible using previous methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Self-citationSchlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Cited by
Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples
Betoule, M., Kessler, R., Guy, J., Mosher, J., Hardin, D., Biswas, R., Astier, P., El-Hage, P., Konig, M., Kuhlmann, S., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423413 · Cited by 1,905
Self-citationRiess, A. G., Strolger, L., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Gold, B., Challis, P. J., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/510378 · Cited by 1,758
The Palomar Transient Factory: System Overview, Performance, and First Results
Law, N. M., Kulkarni, S. R., Dekany, R. G., Ofek, E. O., Quimby, R. M., Nugent, P. E., Surace, J., Grillmair, C. C., Bloom, J. S., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. (2009) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/648598 · Cited by 1,141
Self-citationWood‐Vasey, W. M., Miknaitis, G., Stubbs, C. W., Jha, S., Riess, A. G., Garnavich, P. M., Kirshner, R. P., Aguilera, C., Becker, A. C., Blackman, J. W., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/518642 · Cited by 928
IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW CfA SUPERNOVA TYPE Ia LIGHT CURVES
Hicken, M., Wood-Vasey, W. M., Blondin, S., Challis, P., Jha, S., Kelly, P. L., Rest, A., & Kirshner, R. P. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1097 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Authors
- Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Perrett, K., Bronder, T. J., Hook, I. M., Astier, P., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., Basa, S., Carlberg, R. G., Fabbro, S., Fouchez, D., Guy, J., Lafoux, H., Neill, J. D., Pain, R., Palanque‐Delabrouille, N., Pritchet, C. J., Regnault, N., Rich, J., Taillet, R., Knop, R., McMahon, R. G., Perlmutter, S., & Walton, N. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 634
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1190-1201
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2002298511
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gemini Spectroscopy of Supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey: Improving High‐Redshift Supernova Selection and Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/497119
- The paper
- Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Perrett, K., Bronder, T. J., Hook, I. M., Astier, P., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., Basa, S., Carlberg, R. G., Fabbro, S., Fouchez, D., Guy, J., Lafoux, H., Neill, J. D., Pain, R., Palanque‐Delabrouille, N., Pritchet, C. J., Regnault, N., . . . Walton, N. A. (2005). Gemini Spectroscopy of Supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey: Improving High‐Redshift Supernova Selection and Classification. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/497119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.