Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gemini Spectroscopy of Supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey: Improving High‐Redshift Supernova Selection and Classification

Open access
Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Perrett, K., Bronder, T. J., Hook, I. M., Astier, P., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., Basa, S., Carlberg, R. G., Fabbro, S., Fouchez, D., Guy, J., Lafoux, H., Neill, J. D., Pain, R., Palanque‐Delabrouille, N., Pritchet, C. J., Regnault, N., Rich, J., Taillet, R., Knop, R., McMahon, R. G., Perlmutter, S., Walton, N. A.·2005·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present new techniques for improving the efficiency of supernova (SN) classification at high redshift using 64 candidates observed at Gemini North and South during the first year of the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS). The SNLS is an ongoing 5 year project with the goal of measuring the equation of state of dark energy by discovering and following over 700 high-redshift SNe Ia using data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey. We achieve an improvement in the SN Ia spectroscopic confirmation rate: at Gemini 71% of candidates are now confirmed as SNe Ia, compared to 54% using the methods of previous surveys. This is despite the comparatively high redshift of this sample, in which the median SN Ia redshift is z = 0.81 (0.155 ≤ z ≤ 1.01). These improvements were realized because we use the unprecedented color coverage and light curve sampling of the SNLS to predict whether a candidate is a SN Ia and to estimate its redshift, before obtaining a spectrum, using a new technique called the "SN photo- z ." In addition, we have improved techniques for galaxy subtraction and SN template χ 2 fitting, allowing us to identify candidates even when they are only 15% as bright as the host galaxy. The largest impediment to SN identification is found to be host galaxy contamination of the spectrum—when the SN was at least as bright as the underlying host galaxy the target was identified more than 90% of the time. However, even SNe in bright host galaxies can be easily identified in good seeing conditions. When the image quality was better than 0 55, the candidate was identified 88% of the time. Over the 5 year course of the survey, using the selection techniques presented here, we will be able to add ~170 more confirmed SNe Ia than would be possible using previous methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/497119

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Perrett, K., Bronder, T. J., Hook, I. M., Astier, P., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., Basa, S., Carlberg, R. G., Fabbro, S., Fouchez, D., Guy, J., Lafoux, H., Neill, J. D., Pain, R., Palanque‐Delabrouille, N., Pritchet, C. J., Regnault, N., Rich, J., Taillet, R., Knop, R., McMahon, R. G., Perlmutter, S., & Walton, N. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2005-12
Volume
634
Issue
2
Pages
1190-1201
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2002298511
Cited by
221
References
3
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gemini Spectroscopy of Supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey: Improving High‐Redshift Supernova Selection and Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/497119
The paper
Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Perrett, K., Bronder, T. J., Hook, I. M., Astier, P., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., Basa, S., Carlberg, R. G., Fabbro, S., Fouchez, D., Guy, J., Lafoux, H., Neill, J. D., Pain, R., Palanque‐Delabrouille, N., Pritchet, C. J., Regnault, N., . . . Walton, N. A. (2005). Gemini Spectroscopy of Supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey: Improving High‐Redshift Supernova Selection and Classification. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/497119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.