Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GEMS: The Surface Brightness and Surface Mass Density Evolution of Disk Galaxies

Open access
Barden, Marco, Rix, Hans‐Walter, Somerville, Rachel S., Bell, Eric F., Hausler, Boris, Peng, Chien Y., Borch, Andrea, Beckwith, Steven V. W., Caldwell, John A. R., Heymans, Catherine, Jahnke, Knud, Jogee, Shardha, McIntosh, Daniel H., Meisenheimer, Klaus, Sanchez, Sebastian F., Wisotzki, Lutz, Wolf, Christian·2005·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We combine HST imaging from the GEMS (Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDs) survey with photometric redshifts from COMBO-17 to explore the evolution of disk-dominated galaxies since z ≲ 1.1. The sample is composed of all GEMS galaxies with Sérsic indices n < 2.5, derived from fits to the galaxy images. We account fully for selection effects through careful analysis of image simulations; we are limited by the depth of the redshift and HST data to the study of galaxies with M V ≲ -20, or equivalently, log ≳ 10. We find strong evolution in the magnitude-size scaling relation for galaxies with M V ≲ -20, corresponding to a brightening of ~1 mag arcsec -2 in rest-frame V band by z ~ 1. Yet disks at a given absolute magnitude are bluer and have lower stellar mass-to-light ratios at z ~ 1 than at the present day. As a result, our findings indicate weak or no evolution in the relation between stellar mass and effective disk size for galaxies with log ≳ 10 over the same time interval. This is strongly inconsistent with the most naive theoretical expectation, in which disk size scales in proportion to the halo virial radius, which would predict that disks are a factor of 2 denser at fixed mass at z ~ 1. The lack of evolution in the stellar mass-size relation is consistent with an "inside-out" growth of galaxy disks on average (galaxies increasing in size as they grow more massive), although we cannot rule out more complex evolutionary scenarios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/497679

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Barden, M., Rix, H., Somerville, R. S., Bell, E. F., Hausler, B., Peng, C. Y., Borch, A., Beckwith, S. V. W., Caldwell, J. A. R., Heymans, C., Jahnke, K., Jogee, S., McIntosh, D. H., Meisenheimer, K., Sanchez, S. F., Wisotzki, L., & Wolf, C.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2005-12-20
Volume
635
Issue
2
Pages
959-981
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2018828554
Cited by
241
References
1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GEMS: The Surface Brightness and Surface Mass Density Evolution of Disk Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/497679
The paper
Barden, M., Rix, H., Somerville, R. S., Bell, E. F., Hausler, B., Peng, C. Y., Borch, A., Beckwith, S. V. W., Caldwell, J. A. R., Heymans, C., Jahnke, K., Jogee, S., McIntosh, D. H., Meisenheimer, K., Sanchez, S. F., Wisotzki, L., & Wolf, C. (2005). GEMS: The Surface Brightness and Surface Mass Density Evolution of Disk Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/497679

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.