Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of the Bar Fraction in COSMOS: Quantifying the Assembly of the Hubble Sequence

Open access
Sheth, Kartik, Elmegreen, Debra Meloy, Elmegreen, Bruce G., Capak, Peter, Abraham, Roberto G., Athanassoula, E., Ellis, Richard S., Mobasher, Bahram, Salvato, Mara, Schinnerer, Eva, Scoville, Nicholas Z., Spalsbury, Lori, Strubbe, Linda, Carollo, Marcella, Rich, Michael, West, Andrew A.·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have analyzed the redshift-dependent fraction of galactic bars over 0.2 < z < 0.84 in 2157 luminous face-on spiral galaxies from the COSMOS 2 deg 2 field. Our sample is an order of magnitude larger than that used in any previous investigation, and is based on substantially deeper imaging data than that available from earlier wide-area studies of high-redshift galaxy morphology. We find that the fraction of barred spirals declines rapidly with redshift. Whereas in the local universe about 65% of luminous spiral galaxies contain bars (SB+SAB), at z ∼ 0.84 this fraction drops to about 20%. Over this redshift range the fraction of strong bars (SBs) drops from about 30% to under 10%. It is clear that when the universe was half its present age, the census of galaxies on the Hubble sequence was fundamentally different from that of the present day. A major clue to understanding this phenomenon has also emerged from our analysis, which shows that the bar fraction in spiral galaxies is a strong function of stellar mass, integrated color and bulge prominence. The bar fraction in very massive, luminous spirals is about constant out to z ∼ 0.84, whereas for the low-mass, blue spirals it declines significantly with redshift beyond z = 0.3. There is also a slight preference for bars in bulge-dominated systems at high redshifts that may be an important clue toward the coevolution of bars, bulges, and black holes. Our results thus have important ramifications for the processes responsible for galactic downsizing, suggesting that massive galaxies matured early in a dynamical sense, and not just as a result of the regulation of their star formation rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/524980

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Sheth, K., Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Capak, P., Abraham, R. G., Athanassoula, E., Ellis, R. S., Mobasher, B., Salvato, M., Schinnerer, E., Scoville, N. Z., Spalsbury, L., Strubbe, L., Carollo, M., Rich, M., & West, A. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-03-10
Volume
675
Issue
2
Pages
1141-1155
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2130225077
Cited by
417
References
82
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of the Bar Fraction in COSMOS: Quantifying the Assembly of the Hubble Sequence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/524980
The paper
Sheth, K., Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Capak, P., Abraham, R. G., Athanassoula, E., Ellis, R. S., Mobasher, B., Salvato, M., Schinnerer, E., Scoville, N. Z., Spalsbury, L., Strubbe, L., Carollo, M., Rich, M., & West, A. A. (2008). Evolution of the Bar Fraction in COSMOS: Quantifying the Assembly of the Hubble Sequence. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/524980

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.