Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Size Evolution of Galaxies since z∼3: Combining SDSS, GEMS, and FIRES

Open access
Trujillo, Ignacio, Forster Schreiber, Natascha M., Rudnick, Gregory, Barden, Marco, Franx, Marijn, Rix, Hans‐Walter, Caldwell, J. A. R., McIntosh, Daniel H., Toft, Sune, Haussler, Boris, Zirm, Andrew, van Dokkum, Pieter G., Labbe, Ivo, Moorwood, Alan, Rottgering, Huub, van der Wel, Arjen, van der Werf, Paul, van Starkenburg, Lottie·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present the evolution of the luminosity-size and stellar mass-size relations of luminous ( L V ≳ 3.4 × 10 10 h L ☉ ) and massive ( M * ≳ 3 × 10 10 h M ☉ ) galaxies in the last ~11 Gyr. We use very deep near-infrared images of the Hubble Deep Field-South and the MS 1054-03 field in the J s , H , and K s bands from FIRES to retrieve the sizes in the optical rest frame for galaxies with z > 1. We combine our results with those from GEMS at 0.2 < z < 1 and SDSS at z ~ 0.1 to achieve a comprehensive picture of the optical rest-frame size evolution from z = 0 to 3. Galaxies are differentiated according to their light concentration using the Sérsic index n . For less concentrated objects, the galaxies at a given luminosity were typically ~3 ± 0.5 (±2 σ) times smaller at z ~ 2.5 than those we see today. The stellar mass-size relation has evolved less: the mean size at a given stellar mass was ~2 ± 0.5 times smaller at z ~ 2.5, evolving proportionally to (1 + z ) -0.40±0.06 . Simple scaling relations between dark matter halos and baryons in a hierarchical cosmogony predict a stronger (although consistent within the error bars) than observed evolution of the stellar mass-size relation. The observed luminosity-size evolution out to z ~ 2.5 matches well recent infall model predictions for Milky Way-type objects. For low- n galaxies, the evolution of the stellar mass-size relation would follow naturally if the individual galaxies grow inside out. For highly concentrated objects, the situation is as follows: at a given luminosity, these galaxies were ~2.7 ± 1.1 times smaller at z ~ 2.5 (or, put differently, were typically ~2.2 ± 0.7 mag brighter at a given size than they are today), and at a given stellar mass the size has evolved proportionally to (1 + z ) -0.45±0.10 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/506464

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
Trujillo, I., Forster Schreiber, N. M., Rudnick, G., Barden, M., Franx, M., Rix, H., Caldwell, J. A. R., McIntosh, D. H., Toft, S., Haussler, B., Zirm, A., van Dokkum, P. G., Labbe, I., Moorwood, A., Rottgering, H., van der Wel, A., van der Werf, P., & van Starkenburg, L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-10-10
Volume
650
Issue
1
Pages
18-41
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2074768476
Cited by
517
References
66
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Size Evolution of Galaxies since z∼3: Combining SDSS, GEMS, and FIRES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/506464
The paper
Trujillo, I., Forster Schreiber, N. M., Rudnick, G., Barden, M., Franx, M., Rix, H., Caldwell, J. A. R., McIntosh, D. H., Toft, S., Haussler, B., Zirm, A., van Dokkum, P. G., Labbe, I., Moorwood, A., Rottgering, H., van der Wel, A., van der Werf, P., & van Starkenburg, L. (2006). The Size Evolution of Galaxies since z∼3: Combining SDSS, GEMS, and FIRES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/506464

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.