The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clean Evidence on Peer Effects
Abstract
We study subjects who were asked to fill letters into envelopes with a remuneration independent of output. In the “pair” treatment, two subjects worked at the same time in the same room, and peer effects were possible. In the “single” treatment, subjects worked alone, and peer effects were ruled out. We find evidence of peer effects in the pair treatment because the standard deviations of output are smaller within pairs than between pairs. Moreover, average output is higher in the pair treatment: thus, peer effects raise productivity. Finally, low‐productivity workers are the most sensitive to the behavior of peers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980 · Cited by 4,547
Social Facilitation: A solution is suggested for an old unresolved social psychological problem.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.149.3681.269 · Cited by 2,951
Performance in competitive environments: gender differences
Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360698496 · Cited by 1,997
Cited by
Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field
DellaVigna, S. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.315 · Cited by 2,365
Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju032 · Cited by 1,991
Mas, A., & Moretti, E. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.112 · Cited by 1,280
Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving
DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr050 · Cited by 1,080
Reference Points and Effort Provision
Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L., & Huffman, D. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.470 · Cited by 831
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Falk, A., & Ichino, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Labor Economics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-57
- ISSN
- 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5307
- OpenAlex
- W2007033135
- Cited by
- 824
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 67.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clean Evidence on Peer Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/497818
- The paper
- Falk, A., & Ichino, A. (2006). Clean Evidence on Peer Effects. Journal of Labor Economics. https://doi.org/10.1086/497818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
