The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The N2K Consortium. IV. New Temperatures and Metallicities for More than 100,000 FGK Dwarfs
Open accessAbstract
We have created specialized target lists for radial velocity surveys that are biased toward stars that (1) possess planets and (2) are easiest to observe with current detection techniques. We use a procedure that uniformly estimates fundamental stellar properties of Tycho 2 stars, with errors, using spline functions of broadband photometry and proper motion found in Hipparcos /Tycho 2 and 2MASS. We provide estimates of T eff and distance for 2.4 × 10 6 Tycho 2 stars that lack trigonometric distances. For stars that appear to be FGK dwarfs, we also derive [Fe/H] and identify unresolved binary systems with mass ratios 1.25 < M 1 / M 2 < 3.0. For FGK dwarfs with photometric error σ V < 0.05, or V < 9, our temperature model gives a 1 σ error of σ T = +58.7/ - 65.9 K and our metallicity model gives a 1 σ error of σ [Fe/H] = +0.13/ - 0.14 dex. The binarity model can be used to remove 70% of doubles with 1.25 < M 1 / M 2 < 3.0 from a magnitude-limited sample of dwarfs at a cost of cutting 20% of the sample. Our estimates of distance and spectral type enable us to isolate 354,822 Tycho 2 dwarfs, 321,996 absent from Hipparcos , with giant contamination of 2.6% and 7.2%, respectively. Roughly 100,000 of these stars, not in Hipparcos , have sufficiently low photometric errors to retain 0.13-0.3 dex [Fe/H] accuracy and 80-100 K temperature accuracy (1 σ). Our metallicity estimates have been used to identify targets for N2K, a large-scale radial velocity search for hot jupiters, which has verified the errors presented here. The catalogs that we publish can be used to further large-scale studies of Galactic structure and chemical evolution and to provide potential reference stars for narrow-angle astrometry programs such as the Space Interferometry Mission and large-aperture optical interferometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
Photometric Separation of Stellar Properties Using SDSS Filters
Lenz, D. D., Newberg, H. J., Rosner, R., Richards, G. T., & Stoughton, C. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313155 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Accurate Empirical Radii and Masses of Planets and Their Host Stars with Gaia Parallaxes
Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., & Gaudi, B. S. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5df3 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Ammons, S. M., Robinson, S. E., Strader, J., Laughlin, G., Fischer, D., & Wolf, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-02-20
- Volume
- 638
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1004-1017
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1561585778
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The N2K Consortium. IV. New Temperatures and Metallicities for More than 100,000 FGK Dwarfs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/498490
- The paper
- Ammons, S. M., Robinson, S. E., Strader, J., Laughlin, G., Fischer, D., & Wolf, A. (2006). The N2K Consortium. IV. New Temperatures and Metallicities for More than 100,000 FGK Dwarfs. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/498490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.