Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The N2K Consortium. IV. New Temperatures and Metallicities for More than 100,000 FGK Dwarfs

Open access
Ammons, S. Mark, Robinson, Sarah E., Strader, Jay, Laughlin, Gregory, Fischer, Debra, Wolf, Aaron·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have created specialized target lists for radial velocity surveys that are biased toward stars that (1) possess planets and (2) are easiest to observe with current detection techniques. We use a procedure that uniformly estimates fundamental stellar properties of Tycho 2 stars, with errors, using spline functions of broadband photometry and proper motion found in Hipparcos /Tycho 2 and 2MASS. We provide estimates of T eff and distance for 2.4 × 10 6 Tycho 2 stars that lack trigonometric distances. For stars that appear to be FGK dwarfs, we also derive [Fe/H] and identify unresolved binary systems with mass ratios 1.25 < M 1 / M 2 < 3.0. For FGK dwarfs with photometric error σ V < 0.05, or V < 9, our temperature model gives a 1 σ error of σ T = +58.7/ - 65.9 K and our metallicity model gives a 1 σ error of σ [Fe/H] = +0.13/ - 0.14 dex. The binarity model can be used to remove 70% of doubles with 1.25 < M 1 / M 2 < 3.0 from a magnitude-limited sample of dwarfs at a cost of cutting 20% of the sample. Our estimates of distance and spectral type enable us to isolate 354,822 Tycho 2 dwarfs, 321,996 absent from Hipparcos , with giant contamination of 2.6% and 7.2%, respectively. Roughly 100,000 of these stars, not in Hipparcos , have sufficiently low photometric errors to retain 0.13-0.3 dex [Fe/H] accuracy and 80-100 K temperature accuracy (1 σ). Our metallicity estimates have been used to identify targets for N2K, a large-scale radial velocity search for hot jupiters, which has verified the errors presented here. The catalogs that we publish can be used to further large-scale studies of Galactic structure and chemical evolution and to provide potential reference stars for narrow-angle astrometry programs such as the Space Interferometry Mission and large-aperture optical interferometry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/498490

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Ammons, S. M., Robinson, S. E., Strader, J., Laughlin, G., Fischer, D., & Wolf, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-02-20
Volume
638
Issue
2
Pages
1004-1017
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1561585778
Cited by
226
References
3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The N2K Consortium. IV. New Temperatures and Metallicities for More than 100,000 FGK Dwarfs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/498490
The paper
Ammons, S. M., Robinson, S. E., Strader, J., Laughlin, G., Fischer, D., & Wolf, A. (2006). The N2K Consortium. IV. New Temperatures and Metallicities for More than 100,000 FGK Dwarfs. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/498490

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.