Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Swift Observations of the X‐Ray–Bright GRB 050315

Open access
Vaughan, S., Goad, M. R., Beardmore, A. P., O’Brien, P. T., Osborne, J. P., Page, K. L., Barthelmy, S. D., Burrows, D. N., Campana, S., Cannizzo, J. K., Capalbi, M., Chincarini, G., Cummings, J. R., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P., Godet, O., Hill, J. E., Kobayashi, S., Kumar, P., La Parola, V., Levan, A., Mangano, V., Meszaros, P., Moretti, A., Morris, D. C., Nousek, J. A., Pagani, C., Palmer, D. M., Racusin, J. L., Romano, P., Tagliaferri, G., Zhang, B., Gehrels, N.·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

This paper discusses Swift observations of the γ-ray burst GRB 050315 ( z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay ( t -5 ) for ~200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/γ-ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first ~300 s of X-ray emission (observed by the XRT) can be explained by exponential decays, with similar decay constants. Extrapolating the BAT light curve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading prompt emission; this strong similarity between the prompt γ-ray and early X-ray emission may be related to the simple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray-rich GRB. The prompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to ~15 keV and appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for ~1.2 × 10 4 s, after which time it decayed with a temporal index of α ≈ 0.7, followed by a second break at ~2.5 × 10 5 s to a slope of α ~ 2. The apparent "plateau" in the X-ray light curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift . If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening angle was θ 0 ~ 5 ° , implying E γ ≳ 10 50 ergs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/499069

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Vaughan, S., Goad, M. R., Beardmore, A. P., O’Brien, P. T., Osborne, J. P., Page, K. L., Barthelmy, S. D., Burrows, D. N., Campana, S., Cannizzo, J. K., Capalbi, M., Chincarini, G., Cummings, J. R., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P., Godet, O., Hill, J. E., Kobayashi, S., Kumar, P., La Parola, V., Levan, A., Mangano, V., Meszaros, P., Moretti, A., Morris, D. C., Nousek, J. A., Pagani, C., Palmer, D. M., Racusin, J. L., Romano, P., Tagliaferri, G., Zhang, B., & Gehrels, N.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-02-20
Volume
638
Issue
2
Pages
920-929
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2117735543
Cited by
158
References
0
FWCI
15.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Swift Observations of the X‐Ray–Bright GRB 050315. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/499069
The paper
Vaughan, S., Goad, M. R., Beardmore, A. P., O’Brien, P. T., Osborne, J. P., Page, K. L., Barthelmy, S. D., Burrows, D. N., Campana, S., Cannizzo, J. K., Capalbi, M., Chincarini, G., Cummings, J. R., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P., Godet, O., Hill, J. E., Kobayashi, S., Kumar, P., . . . Gehrels, N. (2006). Swift Observations of the X‐Ray–Bright GRB 050315. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/499069

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.