The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mass‐Metallicity Relation at z≳2
Open accessAbstract
We use a sample of 87 rest-frame UV-selected star-forming galaxies with mean spectroscopic redshift ⟨ z ⟩ = 2.26 ± 0.17 to study the correlation between metallicity and stellar mass at high redshift. Using stellar masses determined from SED fitting to observed 0.3-8 μm photometry, we divide the sample into six bins in stellar mass and construct six composite Hα + [N ] spectra from all of the objects in each bin. We estimate the mean oxygen abundance in each bin from the [N II]/Hα ratio and find a monotonic increase in metallicity with increasing stellar mass, from 12 + log(O/H) < 8.2 for galaxies with ⟨ M ⋆ ⟩ = 2.7 × 10 9 M ☉ to 12 + log(O/H) = 8.6 for galaxies with ⟨ M ⋆ ⟩ = 1.0 × 10 11 M ☉ . We use the empirical relation between SFR density and gas density to estimate the gas fractions of the galaxies, finding an increase in gas fraction with decreasing stellar mass. These gas fractions, combined with the observed metallicities, allow the estimation of the effective yield y eff as a function of stellar mass; in constrast to observations in the local universe, which show a decrease in y eff with decreasing baryonic mass, we find a slight increase. Such a variation of metallicity with gas fraction is best fitted by a model with supersolar yield and an outflow rate ~4 times higher than the SFR. We conclude that the mass-metallicity relation at high redshift is driven by the increase in metallicity as the gas fraction decreases through star formation and is likely modulated by metal loss from strong outflows in galaxies of all masses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
Cited by
A HIGHLY CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE STAR-FORMING “MAIN SEQUENCE” FROM z ∼ 0-6
Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 · Cited by 1,646
Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework
Somerville, R. S., & Davé, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 · Cited by 1,442
Steidel, C. C., Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Reddy, N., Bogosavljević, M., Rudie, G. C., & Rakic, O. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/289 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationLilly, S. J., Carollo, C. M., Pipino, A., Renzini, A., & Peng, Y. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/119 · Cited by 870
De re metallica: the cosmic chemical evolution of galaxies
Maiolino, R., & Mannucci, F. (2019) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 · Cited by 697
Metadata
- Authors
- Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Reddy, N. A., & Adelberger, K. L.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-06-20
- Volume
- 644
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 813-828
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2013575191
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mass‐Metallicity Relation at z≳2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/503623
- The paper
- Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Reddy, N. A., & Adelberger, K. L. (2006). The Mass‐Metallicity Relation at z≳2. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/503623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.