Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,036

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mass‐Metallicity Relation at z≳2

Open access
Erb, Dawn K., Shapley, Alice E., Pettini, Max, Steidel, Charles C., Reddy, Naveen A., Adelberger, Kurt L.·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We use a sample of 87 rest-frame UV-selected star-forming galaxies with mean spectroscopic redshift ⟨ z ⟩ = 2.26 ± 0.17 to study the correlation between metallicity and stellar mass at high redshift. Using stellar masses determined from SED fitting to observed 0.3-8 μm photometry, we divide the sample into six bins in stellar mass and construct six composite Hα + [N ] spectra from all of the objects in each bin. We estimate the mean oxygen abundance in each bin from the [N II]/Hα ratio and find a monotonic increase in metallicity with increasing stellar mass, from 12 + log(O/H) < 8.2 for galaxies with ⟨ M ⋆ ⟩ = 2.7 × 10 9 M ☉ to 12 + log(O/H) = 8.6 for galaxies with ⟨ M ⋆ ⟩ = 1.0 × 10 11 M ☉ . We use the empirical relation between SFR density and gas density to estimate the gas fractions of the galaxies, finding an increase in gas fraction with decreasing stellar mass. These gas fractions, combined with the observed metallicities, allow the estimation of the effective yield y eff as a function of stellar mass; in constrast to observations in the local universe, which show a decrease in y eff with decreasing baryonic mass, we find a slight increase. Such a variation of metallicity with gas fraction is best fitted by a model with supersolar yield and an outflow rate ~4 times higher than the SFR. We conclude that the mass-metallicity relation at high redshift is driven by the increase in metallicity as the gas fraction decreases through star formation and is likely modulated by metal loss from strong outflows in galaxies of all masses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/503623

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,036

Metadata

Authors
Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Reddy, N. A., & Adelberger, K. L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-06-20
Volume
644
Issue
2
Pages
813-828
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2013575191
Cited by
1,036
References
1
FWCI
38.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mass‐Metallicity Relation at z≳2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/503623
The paper
Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Reddy, N. A., & Adelberger, K. L. (2006). The Mass‐Metallicity Relation at z≳2. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/503623

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.