Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing the Curvature Effect and Internal Origin of Gamma‐Ray Burst Prompt Emissions and X‐Ray Flares with Swift Data

Open access
Liang, E. W., Zhang, B., O’Brien, P. T., Willingale, R., Angelini, L., Burrows, D. N., Campana, S., Chincarini, G., Falcone, A., Gehrels, N., Goad, M. R., Grupe, D., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Nousek, J. A., Osborne, J. P., Page, K. L., Tagliaferri, G.·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The X-ray light curves of many GRBs have a steep tail following the gamma-rays and have some erratic flares. We assume that these tails and flares are of ``internal'' origin and that their decline behaviors are dominated by the curvature effect. This effect suggests that the decay slope of the late steep decay part of the light curves is α = 2 + β, where β is the X-ray spectral index. We present a self-consistency test for this scenario with a sample of 36 prompt emission tails/flares in 22 light curves observed by the Swift XRT. We derive the zero time ( t 0 ) for each steep decay component by fitting the light curves with the constraint of α = 2 + β. Our results show that the t 0 values of the prompt emission tails and the tails of well-separated flares are self-consistent with the expectation of the internal dissipation models, indicating that each X-ray flare forms a distinct episode of the central engine activity and the central engine remains active after the prompt emission is over, sometimes up to ~1 day after the GRB trigger. This challenges the conventional models and calls for new ideas to restart the central engine. We further show that the onset time of the late central engine activity does not depend on the GRB duration. We also identify a minority group of GRBs whose combined BAT-XRT light curves are smoothly connected, without an abrupt transition between the prompt emission and the afterglow. These GRBs may have an external origin for both the prompt emission and the afterglow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/504684

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Liang, E. W., Zhang, B., O’Brien, P. T., Willingale, R., Angelini, L., Burrows, D. N., Campana, S., Chincarini, G., Falcone, A., Gehrels, N., Goad, M. R., Grupe, D., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Nousek, J. A., Osborne, J. P., Page, K. L., & Tagliaferri, G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-07-20
Volume
646
Issue
1
Pages
351-357
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2745542828
Cited by
224
References
1
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.