The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dispersal and Species Diversity: A Meta‐Analysis
Abstract
Species diversity in communities of interacting organisms is thought to be enhanced by dispersal, yet mechanisms predicting this have little to say about what effects differing rates of dispersal have on diversity and how dispersal affects diversity at larger spatial scales. I performed meta‐analyses on 23 studies comprising 50 experiments that manipulated species migration and measured community richness or diversity to test three hypotheses: that dispersal increases local diversity; that this effect depends on the rate of dispersal, specifically, that local diversity should be maximized at intermediate dispersal rates or else linearly related to dispersal rate; and that regional diversity may be either unaffected or negatively impacted by dispersal because dispersal tends to homogenize local communities. I found that immigration increased local diversity. Further, in animal studies, diversity appears maximized at intermediate dispersal rates but not with plant studies; however, more standardized studies are needed. Finally, results are ambiguous as to what happens at larger scales, with studies finding either declines or no change in regional diversity with dispersal. Taken together, these results reveal that dispersal has a complex, spatially contingent relationship with patterns of species diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Simberloff, D., Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1987) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1368785 · Cited by 1,387
Cited by
Martínez, I., Stegen, J. C., Maldonado-Gómez, M. X., Eren, A. M., Siba, P. M., Greenhill, A. R., & Walter, J. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.049 · Cited by 576
Biodiversity and ecosystem stability across scales in metacommunities
Wang, S., & Loreau, M. (2016) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12582 · Cited by 335
Local and landscape effects of organic farming on butterfly species richness and abundance
Rundlöf, M., Bengtsson, J., & Smith, H. G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01448.x · Cited by 209
A Multi-Clade Test Supports the Intermediate Dispersal Model of Biogeography
Agnarsson, I., Cheng, R.-C., & Kuntner, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086780 · Cited by 45
Venail, P. A., Maclean, R. C., Meynard, C. N., & Mouquet, N. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2104 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Cadotte, M. W.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 913-924
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2021685288
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.