The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical Limits on Extrasolar Terrestrial Planet Detection with Coronagraphs
Open accessAbstract
Many high-contrast coronagraph designs have recently been proposed. In this paper, their suitability for direct imaging of extrasolar terrestrial planets is reviewed. We also develop a linear algebra based model of coronagraphy that can both explain the behavior of existing coronagraphs and quantify the coronagraphic performance limit imposed by fundamental physics. We find that the maximum theoretical throughput of a coronagraph is equal to 1 minus the nonaberrated noncoronagraphic PSF of the telescope. We describe how a coronagraph reaching this fundamental limit may be designed, and how much improvement over the best existing coronagraph design is still possible. Both the analytical model and numerical simulations of existing designs also show that this theoretical limit rapidly degrades as the source size is increased: the "highest performance" coronagraphs, those with the highest throughput and smallest inner working angle (IWA), are the most sensitive to stellar angular diameter. This unfortunately rules out the possibility of using a small IWA (<λ/ d ) coronagraph for a terrestrial planet imaging mission. Finally, a detailed numerical simulation that accurately accounts for stellar angular size, zodiacal and exozodiacal light is used to quantify the efficiency of coronagraph designs for direct imaging of extrasolar terrestrial planets in a possible real observing program. We find that in the photon noise-limited regime, a 4 m telescope with a theoretically optimal coronagraph is able to detect Earth-like planets around 50 stars with 1 hr exposure time per target (assuming 25% throughput and exozodi levels similar to our solar system). We also show that at least two existing coronagraph design can approach this level of performance in the ideal monochromatic case considered in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foo, G., Swartzlander, G. A., & Palacios, D. (2005) · Frontiers in Optics · doi:10.1364/fio.2005.jwa22 · Cited by 530
Kelsall, T., Weiland, J. L., Franz, B. A., Reach, W. T., Arendt, R. G., Dwek, E., Freudenreich, H. T., Hauser, M. G., Moseley, S. H., Odegard, N. P., et al. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306380 · Cited by 513
The Four‐Quadrant Phase‐Mask Coronagraph. I. Principle
Rouan, D., Riaud, P., Boccaletti, A., Clénet, Y., & Labeyrie, A. (2000) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/317707 · Cited by 376
Annular Groove Phase Mask Coronagraph
Mawet, D., Riaud, P., Absil, O., & Surdej, J. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/462409 · Cited by 360
Stellar Coronograph with Phase Mask
Roddier, F., & Roddier, C. (1997) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/133949 · Cited by 239
Apodized Pupil Lyot Coronagraphs for Arbitrary Telescope Apertures
Soummer, R. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/427923 · Cited by 227
Phase-induced amplitude apodization of telescope pupils for extrasolar terrestrial planet imaging
Guyon, O. (2003) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030457 · Cited by 223
Self-citationHigh‐Contrast Imaging from Space: Speckle Nulling in a Low‐Aberration Regime
Borde, P. J., & Traub, W. A. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/498669 · Cited by 206
Stellar coronagraphy with prolate apodized circular apertures
Soummer, R., Aime, C. J., & Falloon, P. E. (2003) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021573 · Cited by 158
High-Dynamic-Range Imaging Using a Deformable Mirror for Space Coronography
Malbet, F., Yu, J. W., & Shao, M. (1995) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/133563 · Cited by 150
Cited by
FUNDAMENTAL LIMITATIONS OF HIGH CONTRAST IMAGING SET BY SMALL SAMPLE STATISTICS
Mawet, D., Milli, J., Wahhaj, Z., Pelat, D., Absil, O., Delacroix, C., Boccaletti, A., Kasper, M., Kenworthy, M., Marois, C., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/2/97 · Cited by 369
Perryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Guyon, O., Pluzhnik, E. A., Kuchner, M. J., Collins, B., & Ridgway, S. T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-99
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2073819621
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Limits on Extrasolar Terrestrial Planet Detection with Coronagraphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/507630
- The paper
- Guyon, O., Pluzhnik, E. A., Kuchner, M. J., Collins, B., & Ridgway, S. T. (2006). Theoretical Limits on Extrasolar Terrestrial Planet Detection with Coronagraphs. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/507630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.