The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High‐Contrast Imaging from Space: Speckle Nulling in a Low‐Aberration Regime
Open accessAbstract
High-contrast imaging from space must overcome two major noise sources to successfully detect a terrestrial planet angularly close to its parent star: photon noise from diffracted starlight and speckle noise from starlight scattered by instrumentally generated wave front perturbation. Coronagraphs tackle only the photon noise contribution by reducing diffracted starlight at the location of a planet. Speckle noise should be addressed with adaptive optics systems. Following the tracks of Malbet, Yu, and Shao, we develop in this paper two analytical methods for wave front sensing and control that aims at creating "dark holes," i.e., areas of the image plane cleared of speckles, assuming an ideal coronagraph and small aberrations. The first method, "speckle field nulling," is a fast FFT-based algorithm that requires the deformable-mirror influence functions to have identical shapes. The second method, "speckle energy minimization," is more general and provides the optimal deformable mirror shape via matrix inversion. With an N × N deformable mirror, the size of the matrix to be inverted is either N 2 × N 2 in the general case or only N × N if the influence functions can be written as the tensor product of two one-dimensional functions. Moreover, speckle energy minimization makes it possible to trade off some of the dark hole area against an improved contrast. For both methods, complex wave front aberrations (amplitude and phase) are measured using just three images taken with the science camera (no dedicated wave front sensing channel is used); therefore, there are no noncommon path errors. We assess the theoretical performance of both methods with numerical simulations including realistic speckle noise and experimental influence functions. We find that these speckle-nulling techniques should be able to improve the contrast by several orders of magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
FUNDAMENTAL LIMITATIONS OF HIGH CONTRAST IMAGING SET BY SMALL SAMPLE STATISTICS
Mawet, D., Milli, J., Wahhaj, Z., Pelat, D., Absil, O., Delacroix, C., Boccaletti, A., Kasper, M., Kenworthy, M., Marois, C., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/2/97 · Cited by 369
Perryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
Theoretical Limits on Extrasolar Terrestrial Planet Detection with Coronagraphs
Guyon, O., Pluzhnik, E. A., Kuchner, M. J., Collins, B., & Ridgway, S. T. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/507630 · Cited by 340
Spectral Evolution of an Earth‐like Planet
Kaltenegger, L., Traub, W. A., & Jucks, K. W. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/510996 · Cited by 274
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Borde, P. J., & Traub, W. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-02-10
- Volume
- 638
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 488-498
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2035766362
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐Contrast Imaging from Space: Speckle Nulling in a Low‐Aberration Regime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/498669
- The paper
- Borde, P. J., & Traub, W. A. (2006). High‐Contrast Imaging from Space: Speckle Nulling in a Low‐Aberration Regime. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/498669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.