Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 711

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spitzer Survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud: Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy?s Evolution (SAGE). I. Overview and Initial Results

Open access
Meixner, Margaret, Gordon, Karl D., Indebetouw, Remy, Hora, Joseph L., Whitney, Barbara, Blum, Robert, Reach, William, Bernard, Jean‐Philippe, Meade, Marilyn, Babler, Brian, Engelbracht, Charles W., For, Bi‐Qing, Misselt, Karl, Vijh, Uma, Leitherer, Claus, Cohen, Martin, Churchwell, Ed B., Boulanger, Francois, Frogel, Jay A., Fukui, Yasuo, Gallagher, Jay, Gorjian, Varoujan, Harris, Jason, Kelly, Douglas, Kawamura, Akiko, Kim, SoYoung, Latter, William B., Madden, Suzanne, Markwick‐Kemper, Ciska, Mizuno, Akira, Mizuno, Norikazu, Mould, Jeremy, Nota, Antonella, Oey, M.S., Olsen, Knut, Onishi, Toshikazu, Paladini, Roberta, Panagia, Nino, Perez‐Gonzalez, Pablo, Shibai, Hiroshi, Sato, Shuji, Smith, Linda, Staveley‐Smith, Lister, Tielens, A. G. G. M., Ueta, Toshiya, Dyk, Schuyler Van, Volk, Kevin, Werner, Michael, Zaritsky, Dennis·2006·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We are performing a uniform and unbiased imaging survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC; ∼7° × 7°) using the IRAC (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 μm) and MIPS (24, 70, and 160 μm) instruments on board the Spitzer Space Telescope in the Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy's Evolution (SAGE) survey, these agents being the interstellar medium (ISM) and stars in the LMC. This paper provides an overview of the SAGE Legacy project, including observing strategy, data processing, and initial results. Three key science goals determined the coverage and depth of the survey. The detection of diffuse ISM with column densities >1.2 × 10 21 H cm -2 permits detailed studies of dust processes in the ISM. SAGE's point-source sensitivity enables a complete census of newly formed stars with masses >3 M ⊙ that will determine the current star formation rate in the LMC. SAGE's detection of evolved stars with mass-loss rates >1 × 10 -8 M ⊙ yr -1 will quantify the rate at which evolved stars inject mass into the ISM of the LMC. The observing strategy includes two epochs in 2005, separated by 3 months, that both mitigate instrumental artifacts and constrain source variability. The SAGE data are nonproprietary. The data processing includes IRAC and MIPS pipelines and a database for mining the point-source catalogs, which will be released to the community in support of Spitzer proposal cycles 4 and 5. We present initial results on the epoch 1 data for a region near N79 and N83. The MIPS 70 and 160 μm images of the diffuse dust emission of the N79/N83 region reveal a similar distribution to the gas emissions, especially the H I 21 cm emission. The measured point-source sensitivity for the epoch 1 data is consistent with expectations for the survey. The point-source counts are highest for the IRAC 3.6 μm band and decrease dramatically toward longer wavelengths, consistent with the fact that stars dominate the point-source catalogs and the dusty objects detected at the longer wavelengths are rare in comparison. The SAGE epoch 1 point-source catalog has ∼4 × 10 6 sources, and more are anticipated when the epoch 1 and 2 data are combined. Using Milky Way (MW) templates as a guide, we adopt a simplified point-source classification to identify three candidate groups—stars without dust, dusty evolved stars, and young stellar objects—that offer a starting point for this work. We outline a strategy for identifying foreground MW stars, which may comprise as much as 18% of the source list, and background galaxies, which may comprise ∼12% of the source list.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/508185

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 711

Metadata

Authors
Meixner, M., Gordon, K. D., Indebetouw, R., Hora, J. L., Whitney, B., Blum, R., Reach, W., Bernard, J., Meade, M., Babler, B., Engelbracht, C. W., For, B., Misselt, K., Vijh, U., Leitherer, C., Cohen, M., Churchwell, E. B., Boulanger, F., Frogel, J. A., Fukui, Y., Gallagher, J., Gorjian, V., Harris, J., Kelly, D., Kawamura, A., Kim, S., Latter, W. B., Madden, S., Markwick‐Kemper, C., Mizuno, A., Mizuno, N., Mould, J., Nota, A., Oey, M. S., Olsen, K., Onishi, T., Paladini, R., Panagia, N., Perez‐Gonzalez, P., Shibai, H., Sato, S., Smith, L., Staveley‐Smith, L., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Ueta, T., Dyk, S. V., Volk, K., Werner, M., & Zaritsky, D.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2006-01
Volume
132
Issue
6
Pages
2268-2288
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2077456416
Cited by
711
References
0
FWCI
26.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spitzer Survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud: Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy?s Evolution (SAGE). I. Overview and Initial Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/508185
The paper
Meixner, M., Gordon, K. D., Indebetouw, R., Hora, J. L., Whitney, B., Blum, R., Reach, W., Bernard, J., Meade, M., Babler, B., Engelbracht, C. W., For, B., Misselt, K., Vijh, U., Leitherer, C., Cohen, M., Churchwell, E. B., Boulanger, F., Frogel, J. A., . . . Zaritsky, D. (2006). Spitzer Survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud: Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy?s Evolution (SAGE). I. Overview and Initial Results. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/508185

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.