Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empirical Models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models

Open access
Merritt, David, Graham, Alister W., Moore, Ben, Diemand, Jürg, Terzić, Balša·2006·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We use techniques from nonparametric function estimation theory to extract the density profiles, and their derivatives, from a set of N -body dark matter halos. We consider halos generated from ΛCDM simulations of gravitational clustering, as well as isolated spherical collapses. The logarithmic density slopes γ ≡ d log ρ/ d log r of the ΛCDM halos are found to vary as power laws in radius, reaching values of γ ≈ -1 at the innermost resolved radii, ∼10 -2 r vir . This behavior is significantly different from that of broken-power-law models like the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile but similar to that of models like de Vaucouleurs's. Accordingly, we compare the N -body density profiles with various parametric models to find which provide the best fit. We consider an NFW-like model with arbitrary inner slope; Dehnen & McLaughlin's anisotropic model; Einasto's model (identical in functional form to Sérsic's model but fitted to the space density); and the density model of Prugniel & Simien that was designed to match the deprojected form of Sérsic's R 1/ n law. Overall, the best-fitting model to the ΛCDM halos is Einasto's, although the Prugniel-Simien and Dehnen-McLaughlin models also perform well. With regard to the spherical-collapse halos, both the Prugniel-Simien and Einasto models describe the density profiles well, with an rms scatter some 4 times smaller than that obtained with either the NFW-like model or the three-parameter Dehnen-McLaughlin model. Finally, we confirm recent claims of a systematic variation in profile shape with halo mass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/508988

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Merritt, D., Graham, A. W., Moore, B., Diemand, J., & Terzić, B.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2006-01
Volume
132
Issue
6
Pages
2685-2700
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2047722794
Cited by
611
References
2
FWCI
14.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical Models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/508988
The paper
Merritt, D., Graham, A. W., Moore, B., Diemand, J., & Terzić, B. (2006). Empirical Models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/508988

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.