Cited by 192Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Evidence for dark matter in the inner Milky Way

Open access
Iocco, Fabio, Pato, Miguel, Bertone, Gianfranco·2015·Nature Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys3237

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pre-Gaia analyses of the inner Milky Way rotation curve had established robust evidence for a non-baryonic dark component already at R ≲ R0.

    “PreGaia analyses of the inner MW rotation curve had nonetheless established robust evidence for a non-baryonic dark component already at R ≲ R 0 (Iocco et al., 2015), complementing the kinematic and dynamical constraints on the outer halo.”
  • Currently, the stellar disc mass of the Galaxy is poorly constrained and thus cannot be used to distinguish between the two models, although most measurements agree better with the lower stellar mass of the contracted NFW halo model.

    “Currently, the stellar disc mass of our galaxy is poorly constrained (e.g. see the compilation of stellar profiles in Iocco et al. 2015) and thus cannot be used to distinguish between the two models, although most measurements agree better with the lower stellar mass of the contracted NFW halo model”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Iocco et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iocco, F., Pato, M., & Bertone, G.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2015-02-09
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
245-248
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2007025690
Cited by
192
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 14
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
dark matter, Milky Way, galaxy rotation curves, baryonic mass distribution, inner Galaxy, solar neighborhood, halo density profiles, dark matter searches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review