The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Progenitor of SN 2005gl and the Nature of Type IIn Supernovae
Open accessAbstract
We present a study of the Type IIn supernova (SN) 2005gl, in the relatively nearby ( d ≈ 66 Mpc) galaxy NGC 266. Photometry and spectroscopy of the SN indicate that it is a typical member of its class. Pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) imaging of the location of the SN, along with a precise localization of this event using the laser guide star assisted adaptive optics (LGS-AO) system at Keck Observatory, are combined to identify a luminous ( M V = -10.3 mag) point source as the possible progenitor of SN 2005gl. If the source is indeed a single star, it was likely a member of the class of luminous blue variable stars (LBVs). This finding leads us to consider the possible general association of SNe IIn with LBV progenitors; it is indeed supported by observations of other SNe, and the known properties of LBV stars. For example, we argue that should the prototypical Galactic LBV η Carina explode in a phase similar to its current state, it will likely produce a SN IIn. We discuss our findings in the context of current ideas about the evolution of massive stars and review the census of SNe with identified progenitors. The concept of the progenitor-SN map is introduced as a convenient means to discuss the present status and future prospects of direct searches for SN progenitors. We conclude that this field has matured considerably in recent years, and the transition from anecdotal information about rare single events to robust associations of progenitor classes with specific SN types has already begun.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Cited by
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Smith, N. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 · Cited by 1,042
“The mass-loss rates indicated by the CSM suggest that viable progenitors could be LBVs (Gal-Yam et al. 2007, Taddia et al. 2013) as well as extreme RSGs or YHGs (Smith et al. 2009) (see Fig 3).”
BackgroundMethodWISeREP—An Interactive Supernova Data Repository
Yaron, O., & Gal-Yam, A. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/666656 · Cited by 772
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gal‐Yam, A., Leonard, D. C., Fox, D. B., Cenko, S. B., Soderberg, A. M., Moon, D. ‐., Sand, D. J., Program), (. C. C., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V., Aldering, G., & Copin, Y.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-02-10
- Volume
- 656
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 372-381
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1982502140
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Progenitor of SN 2005gl and the Nature of Type IIn Supernovae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/510523
- The paper
- Gal‐Yam, A., Leonard, D. C., Fox, D. B., Cenko, S. B., Soderberg, A. M., Moon, D. ‐., Sand, D. J., Program), (. C. C., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V., Aldering, G., & Copin, Y. (2007). On the Progenitor of SN 2005gl and the Nature of Type IIn Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/510523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.