The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiation‐Hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapse and Fragmentation in Massive Protostellar Cores
Open accessAbstract
We simulate the early stages of the evolution of turbulent, virialized, high-mass protostellar cores, with primary attention to how cores fragment and whether they form a small or large number of protostars. Our simulations use the Orion adaptive mesh refinement code to follow the collapse from ~0.1 pc scales to ~10 AU scales, for durations that cover the main fragmentation phase, using three-dimensional gravito-radiation hydrodynamics. We find that for a wide range of initial conditions radiation feedback from accreting protostars inhibits the formation of fragments, so that the vast majority of the collapsed mass accretes onto one or a few objects. Most of the fragmentation that does occur takes place in massive, self-shielding disks. These are driven to gravitational instability by rapid accretion, producing rapid mass and angular momentum transport that allows most of the gas to accrete onto the central star rather than forming fragments. In contrast, a control run using the same initial conditions but an isothermal equation of state produces much more fragmentation, both in and out of the disk. We conclude that massive cores with observed properties are not likely to fragment into many stars, so that, at least at high masses, the core mass function probably determines the stellar initial mass function. Our results also demonstrate that simulations of massive star-forming regions that do not include radiative transfer, and instead rely on a barotropic equation of state or optically thin heating and cooling curves, are likely to produce misleading results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Gravitational Stability of a Disk of Stars
Toomre, A. (1964) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/147861 · Cited by 3,349
Cited by
Toward Understanding Massive Star Formation
Zinnecker, H., & Yorke, H. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549 · Cited by 1,248
Dynamics of Protoplanetary Disks
Armitage, P. J. (2011) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102521 · Cited by 517
How do massive black holes get their gas?
Hopkins, P. F., & Quataert, E. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17064.x · Cited by 503
Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/191 · Cited by 476
EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE PROTOSTARS WITH HIGH ACCRETION RATES
Hosokawa, T., & Omukai, K. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/1/823 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Krumholz, M. R., Klein, R. I., & McKee, C. F.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-02-20
- Volume
- 656
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 959-979
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1967433269
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation‐Hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapse and Fragmentation in Massive Protostellar Cores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/510664
- The paper
- Krumholz, M. R., Klein, R. I., & McKee, C. F. (2007). Radiation‐Hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapse and Fragmentation in Massive Protostellar Cores. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/510664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.