Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor Parallaxes of Galactic Cepheid Variable Stars: Period-Luminosity Relations

Open access
Benedict, G. Fritz, McArthur, Barbara E., Feast, Michael W., Barnes, Thomas G., Harrison, Thomas E., Patterson, Richard J., Menzies, John W., Bean, Jacob L., Freedman, Wendy L.·2007·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We present new absolute trigonometric parallaxes and relative proper motions for nine Galactic Cepheid variable stars: ℓ Car, ζ Gem, β Dor, W Sgr, X Sgr, Y Sgr, FF Aql, T Vul, and RT Aur. We obtain these results with astrometric data from Fine Guidance Sensor 1r, a white-light interferometer on the Hubble Space Telescope . We find absolute parallaxes in milliarcseconds: ℓ Car, 2.01 ± 0.20 mas; ζ Gem, 2.78 ± 0.18 mas; β Dor, 3.14 ± 0.16 mas; W Sgr, 2.28 ± 0.20 mas; X Sgr, 3.00 ± 0.18 mas; Y Sgr, 2.13 ± 0.29 mas; FF Aql, 2.81 ± 0.18 mas; T Vul, 1.90 ± 0.23 mas; and RT Aur, 2.40 ± 0.19 mas; average σ π /π = 8%. Two stars (FF Aql and W Sgr) required the inclusion of binary astrometric perturbations, providing Cepheid mass estimates. With these parallaxes we compute absolute magnitudes in V , I , K , and Wesenheit W VI bandpasses, corrected for interstellar extinction and Lutz-Kelker-Hanson bias. Adding our previous absolute magnitude determination for δ Cep, we construct period-luminosity relations (PLRs) for 10 Galactic Cepheids. We compare our new PLRs with those adopted by several recent investigations, including the Freedman and Sandage H 0 projects. Adopting our PLR would tend to increase the Sandage H 0 value, but leave the Freedman H 0 unchanged. Comparing our Galactic Cepheid PLR with those derived from LMC Cepheids, we find the slopes for K and W VI to be identical in the two galaxies within their respective errors. Our data lead to a W VI distance modulus for the LMC m - M = 18.50 ± 0.03, uncorrected for any metallicity effects. Applying recently derived metallicity corrections yields a corrected LMC distance modulus of ( m - M ) 0 = 18.40 ± 0.05. Comparing our PLR to solar-metallicity Cepheids in NGC 4258 results in a distance modulus 29.28 ± 0.08 that agrees with one derived from maser studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/511980

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Feast, M. W., Barnes, T. G., Harrison, T. E., Patterson, R. J., Menzies, J. W., Bean, J. L., & Freedman, W. L.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2007-03-15
Volume
133
Issue
4
Pages
1810-1827
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W1994328808
Cited by
364
References
39
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor Parallaxes of Galactic Cepheid Variable Stars: Period-Luminosity Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/511980
The paper
Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Feast, M. W., Barnes, T. G., Harrison, T. E., Patterson, R. J., Menzies, J. W., Bean, J. L., & Freedman, W. L. (2007). Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor Parallaxes of Galactic Cepheid Variable Stars: Period-Luminosity Relations. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/511980

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.