Cited by 38Library Science and AdministrationLibrary Science and Information LiteracyInformation Science and Libraries

The Library in the Lives of Latino College Students

Open access
Adkins, Denice, Hussey, Lisa·2006·The Library Quarterly

Abstract

Libraries share a perception of embracing and providing for all users. However, they also share a common philosophical stance shaped by librarians’ individual discursive formations and the dominant cultural hegemony that values some users over others. Latinos constitute one of the fastest‐growing, nondominant populations in the United States, and the literature suggests that libraries do not always serve them adequately. This was reinforced by interviews with seven Latino undergraduate students that suggest ambiguous feelings toward libraries and a strong need for some sort of cultural reinforcement. This study of users’ perceptions of libraries may help librarians and policy makers consider more pluralistic approaches to library services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/513862

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of a cultural history of excluding people of color from power and decision making and a racially homogenous profession, past and present decision makers about library spaces tend to share a cultural understanding of what faculty and student work is and should be; this may differ from realities of library staff and students of color.

    “Unfortunately, with a cultural history of excluding people of color from positions of power and decision making, and a profession that continues to be extremely racially homogenous, those who have made decisions about library spaces in the past and those who continue to make them in the present tend to have a shared cultural understanding of what the work of faculty and students is and should be.S”
  • Several Latino/a students preferred local public libraries because they were smaller, more spatially legible, and had more visible culturally responsive material.

    “Interestingly, several of the students interviewed reported that they preferred their local public libraries because they were smaller, more spatially legible, and had more visible culturally responsive material (p.472).”
  • Adkins and Hussey (2006) explored to what extent the values and interests of Latina/Latino college students are reflected in library systems in the US, touching on the governance dimension.

    “Adkins and Hussey (2006), for example, explored to what extent the values and interests of Latina/Latino college students are reflected in library systems in the US, thus touching on the governance dimension.”

Authors
Adkins, D., & Hussey, L.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
The Library Quarterly
Published
2006-10
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
456-480
ISSN
  • 0024-2519 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-652X
OpenAlex
W2091488053
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Library Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
Latino college students, library users' perceptions, library services, cultural hegemony, library inclusion, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review