The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbiology of Sputum from Patients at Cystic Fibrosis Centers in the United States
Abstract
During a phase III national collaborative study of aerosolized tobramycin (1 July 1995 through 30 September 1996), the microbiology of specimens from 595 patients at 69 cystic fibrosis (CF) centers was examined. Samples from three screening visits were processed in a single laboratory by means of standardized techniques for identification and susceptibility testing. From 1,753 pretreatment specimens, 5,128 pathogens were isolated (average, 2.9/specimen). Of the 3,936 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, 56.7% were mucoid. The specimens of 125 patients (21.0%) yielded tobramycin-resistant P. aeruginosa (213 isolates); 61 (10.3%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; and 52 (8.7%), Alcaligenes xylosoxidans. Isolation of Burkholderia cepacia was an exclusion criterion. Only visit 3 sputum samples were cultured for gram-positive organisms and fungi (n = 465 patients); samples from 201 patients (43.2%) yielded Staphylococcus aureus (18.8% of isolates were oxacillin-resistant), and those from 114 (24.5%) yielded an Aspergillus species. Compared with the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, the current study identified many more patients colonized with S. maltophilia, A. xylosoxidans, Aspergillus species, and oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, suggesting the utility of standardized processing of CF specimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Saiman, L., Marshall, B. C., Mayer-Hamblett, N., Burns, J. L., Quittner, A. L., Cibene, D. A., Coquillette, S., Fieberg, A. Y., Accurso, F. J., Campbell III, P. W., et al. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.13.1749 · Cited by 958
Self-citationLongitudinal Assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Young Children with Cystic Fibrosis
Burns, J. L., Gibson, R. L., McNamara, S., Yim, D., Emerson, J., Rosenfeld, M., Hiatt, P., McCoy, K., Castile, R., Smith, A. L., et al. (2001) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/318075 · Cited by 555
Self-citationTobramycin Solution for Inhalation Reduces Sputum Pseudomonas aeruginosa Density in Bronchiectasis
BARKER, A. F., COUCH, L., FIEL, S. B., GOTFRIED, M. H., ILOWITE, J., MEYER, K. C., O'DONNELL, A., SAHN, S. A., SMITH, L. J., STEWART, J. O., et al. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9910086 · Cited by 337
Biswas, L., Biswas, R., Schlag, M., Bertram, R., & Götz, F. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01211-09 · Cited by 182
Inflammation and Airway Microbiota during Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbations
Zemanick, E. T., Harris, J. K., Wagner, B. D., Robertson, C. E., Sagel, S. D., Stevens, M. J., Accurso, F. J., & Laguna, T. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062917 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Burns, J. L., Emerson, J., Stapp, J. R., Yim, D. L., Krzewinski, J., Louden, L., Ramsey, B. W., & Clausen, C. R.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 158-163
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2088707861
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiology of Sputum from Patients at Cystic Fibrosis Centers in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/514631
- The paper
- Burns, J. L., Emerson, J., Stapp, J. R., Yim, D. L., Krzewinski, J., Louden, L., Ramsey, B. W., & Clausen, C. R. (1998). Microbiology of Sputum from Patients at Cystic Fibrosis Centers in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/514631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.