The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ages for Illustrative Field Stars Using Gyrochronology: Viability, Limitations, and Errors
Open accessAbstract
We here develop an improved way of using a rotating star as a clock, set it using the Sun, and demonstrate that it keeps time well. This technique, called gyrochronology, derives ages for low-mass main-sequence stars using only their rotation periods and colors. The technique is developed here and used to derive ages for illustrative groups of nearby field stars with measured rotation periods. We first demonstrate the reality of the interface sequence, the unifying feature of the rotational observations of cluster and field stars that makes the technique possible, and extend it beyond the proposal of Skumanich by specifying the mass dependence of rotation for these stars. We delineate which stars it cannot currently be used on. We then calibrate the age dependence using the Sun. The errors are propagated to understand their dependence on color and period. Representative age errors associated with the technique are estimated at ~15% (plus possible systematic errors) for late F, G, K, and early M stars. Gyro ages for the Mount Wilson stars are shown to be in good agreement with chromospheric ages for all but the bluest stars, and probably superior. Gyro ages are then calculated for each of the active main-sequence field stars studied by Strassmeier and collaborators. These are shown to have a median age of 365 Myr. The sample of single field stars assembled by Pizzolato and collaborators is then assessed and shown to have gyro ages ranging from under 100 Myr to several Gyr, with a median age of 1.2 Gyr. Finally, we demonstrate that the individual components of the three wide binaries ξ Boo AB, 61 Cyg AB, and α Cen AB yield substantially the same gyro ages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pizzolato, N., Maggio, A., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., & Ventura, P. (2003) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021560 · Cited by 853
Age of meteorites and the Earth
Patterson, C. (1956) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(56)90036-9 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Improved Age Estimation for Solar‐Type Dwarfs Using Activity‐Rotation Diagnostics
Mamajek, E. E., & Hillenbrand, L. A. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/591785 · Cited by 1,313
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
The habitability of planets orbiting M-dwarf stars
Shields, A. L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.003 · Cited by 319
Debris Disks around Sun‐like Stars
Trilling, D. E., Bryden, G., Beichman, C. A., Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., Stansberry, J. A., Blaylock, M., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Beeman, J. W., & Haller, E. E. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/525514 · Cited by 295
Stellar winds on the main-sequence: II. The evolution of rotation and winds
Johnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Brott, I., & Lüftinger, T. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425301 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnes, S. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-11-10
- Volume
- 669
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1167-1189
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2126415466
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ages for Illustrative Field Stars Using Gyrochronology: Viability, Limitations, and Errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/519295
- The paper
- Barnes, S. A. (2007). Ages for Illustrative Field Stars Using Gyrochronology: Viability, Limitations, and Errors. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/519295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.