Cited by 853Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The stellar activity-rotation relationship revisited: Dependence of saturated and non-saturated X-ray emission regimes on stellar mass for late-type dwarfs

Open access
Pizzolato, N., Maggio, A., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., Ventura, P.·2003·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We present the results of a new study on the relationship between coronal X-ray emission and stellar rotation in late-type main-sequence stars. We have selected a sample of 259 dwarfs in the range 0.5–2.0, including 110 field stars and 149 members of the Pleiades, Hyades, α Persei, IC 2602 and IC 2391 open clusters. All the stars have been observed with ROSAT, and most of them have photometrically-measured rotation periods available. Our results confirm that two emission regimes exist, one in which the rotation period is a good predictor of the total X-ray luminosity, and the other in which a constant saturated X-ray to bolometric luminosity ratio is attained; we present a quantitative estimate of the critical rotation periods below which stars of different masses (or spectral types) enter the saturated regime. In this work we have also empirically derived a characteristic time scale, , which we have used to investigate the relationship between the X-ray emission level and an X-ray-based Rossby number : we show that our empirical time scale resembles the theoretical convective turnover time for , but it also has the same functional dependence on as in the color range . Our results imply that – for non-saturated coronae – the Lx – Prot relation is equivalent to the vs. Re relation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20021560

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saturation is typically seen around 3.2 ± 0.2, and this is expected for rotation periods less than about 3.5 days for K5 stars.

    “where saturation is typically seen around 3 : 2 0 : 2, and this is expected for rotation periods less than about 3.5 days for K5 stars (Pizzolato et al. 2003).”

    From A search for transiting companions in the J1407 (V1400 Cen) system (2021) · cites this paper as Pizzolato et al. 2003

    Table 4 reports a saturation threshold of 3.5 ± 1.5 days for its 1.07 < B−V < 1.35 color bin, consistent with the approximate period claimed. But the corresponding saturation level is −3.2 ± 0.2 for log(Lx/Lbol), not positive 3.2 ± 0.2; the paper also does not label that bin specifically as K5 stars. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A K5-type star with rotation period 3.20 days would be predicted to have soft X-ray emission around the saturation level (log(L_X/L_bol) = -3.2 +/- 0.3), perfectly consistent with the observed ROSAT X-ray flux (log(L_X/L_bol) = -3.2), and consistent with other Sco-Cen pre-MS stars.

    “A K5-type star with rotation period of 3.20 days would be predicted to have soft X-ray emission around the saturation level (log(L X /L bol ) -3.2 ± 0.3; Pizzolato et al. 2003), perfectly consistent with the observed ROSAT X-ray flux (log(L X /L bol ) -3.2), and consistent with other Sco-Cen pre-MS stars (Mamajek et al. 2002).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Prosser, C. F., & Grankin, K. N. 1997, CfA preprint, 4539
  2. Randich, S. 2000, in Stellar Cluster and Associations: Convection, Rotation, and Dynamos, ed. R. Pallavicini, G. Micela, & S. Sciortino, ASP Conf. Ser., 198, 401

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pizzolato, N., Maggio, A., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., & Ventura, P.
Affiliations
  • Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo (IT)
  • Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2002-12-11
Volume
397
Issue
1
Pages
147-157
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2098479840
Cited by
853
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 41
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agenzia Spaziale Italiana
  • Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
stellar X-ray emission, coronal X-ray emission, stellar rotation periods, stellar mass dependence, Rossby number, convective turnover time, open clusters, Pleiades, Hyades, IC 2602, IC 2391

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review