The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outbreak Management and Implications of a Nosocomial Norovirus Outbreak
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Noroviruses are enterically transmitted and are a frequent cause of gastroenteritis, affecting 23 million people annually in the United States. We describe a norovirus outbreak and its control in a tertiary care hospital during February-May 2004. METHODS: Patients and health care workers met the case definition if they had new onset of vomiting and/or diarrhea during the outbreak period. Selected stool samples were tested for norovirus RNA. We also determined outbreak costs, including the estimated lost revenue associated with unit closures, sick leave, and cleaning expenses. RESULTS: We identified 355 cases that affected 90 patients and 265 health care workers and that were clustered in the coronary care unit and psychiatry units. Attack rates were 5.3% (7 of 133) for patients and 29.9% (29 of 97) for health care workers in the coronary care unit and 16.7% (39 of 233) for patients and 38.0% (76 of 200) for health care workers in the psychiatry units. Thirteen affected health care workers (4.9%) required emergency department visits or hospitalization. Detected noroviruses had 98%-99% sequence identity with representatives of a new genogroup II.4 variant that emerged during 2002-2004 in the United States (e.g., Farmington Hills and other strains) and Europe. Aggressive infection-control measures, including closure of units and thorough disinfection using sodium hypochlorite, were required to terminate the outbreak. Costs associated with this outbreak were estimated to be $657,644. CONCLUSIONS: The significant disruption of patient care and cost of this single nosocomial outbreak support aggressive efforts to prevent transmission of noroviruses in health care settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tang, J. W., Li, Y., Eames, I., Chan, P. K. S., & Ridgway, G. L. (2006) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.05.022 · Cited by 667
Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control in Acute-Care Settings
Sydnor, E. R. M., & Perl, T. M. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00027-10 · Cited by 652
Self-citationMechanisms of GII.4 Norovirus Persistence in Human Populations
Lindesmith, L. C., Donaldson, E. F., LoBue, A. D., Cannon, J. L., Zheng, D.-P., Vinje, J., & Baric, R. S. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050031 · Cited by 573
Global Economic Burden of Norovirus Gastroenteritis
Bartsch, S. M., Lopman, B. A., Ozawa, S., Hall, A. J., & Lee, B. Y. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151219 · Cited by 567
The fluid dynamics of disease transmission
Bourouiba, L. (2021) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-060220-113712 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston, C. P., Qiu, H., Ticehurst, J. R., Dickson, C., Rosenbaum, P., Lawson, P., Stokes, A. B., Lowenstein, C. J., Kaminsky, M., Cosgrove, S. E., Green, K. Y., & Perl, T. M.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 534-540
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2167842728
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outbreak Management and Implications of a Nosocomial Norovirus Outbreak. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/520666
- The paper
- Johnston, C. P., Qiu, H., Ticehurst, J. R., Dickson, C., Rosenbaum, P., Lawson, P., Stokes, A. B., Lowenstein, C. J., Kaminsky, M., Cosgrove, S. E., Green, K. Y., & Perl, T. M. (2007). Outbreak Management and Implications of a Nosocomial Norovirus Outbreak. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/520666
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.