Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The First Survey of X‐Ray Flares from Gamma‐Ray Bursts Observed by Swift: Spectral Properties and Energetics

Open access
Falcone, A. D., Morris, D., Racusin, J., Chincarini, G., Moretti, A., Romano, P., Burrows, D. N., Pagani, C., Stroh, M., Grupe, D., Campana, S., Covino, S., Tagliaferri, G., Willingale, R., Gehrels, N.·2007·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

GRB observations with Swift produced the initially surprising result that many bursts have large, late-time X-ray flares. The flares were sometimes intense, had rapid rise and decay phases, and occurred late relative to the prompt phase. Many GRBs have had several flares, which were sometimes overlapping. The origin of the flares can be investigated by comparing the spectra during the flares to those of the afterglow and the initial prompt emission. In this work we have analyzed all significant X-ray flares from the first 110 GRBs observed by Swift. Significant X-ray flares (>3 σ ) were found in 33 of these GRBs, with 77 flares detected. A variety of spectral models have been fit to each flare. We find that the spectral fits sometimes favor a Band function model, which is more akin to the prompt emission than to that of the afterglow. While some flares are approximately as energetic as the prompt GRB emission, we find that the average fluence of the flares is approximately 10 times below the average prompt GRB fluence. We also find that the peak energy of the observed flares is typically in the soft X-ray band, as one might expect due to the X-ray selection of the sample. These results, when combined with those presented in the companion paper on temporal properties of flares, support the hypothesis that many X-ray flares are from late-time activity of the internal engine that spawned the initial GRB, not from an afterglow-related effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/523296

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Falcone, A. D., Morris, D., Racusin, J., Chincarini, G., Moretti, A., Romano, P., Burrows, D. N., Pagani, C., Stroh, M., Grupe, D., Campana, S., Covino, S., Tagliaferri, G., Willingale, R., & Gehrels, N.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2007-12-20
Volume
671
Issue
2
Pages
1921-1938
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1963756732
Cited by
195
References
1
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The First Survey of X‐Ray Flares from Gamma‐Ray Bursts Observed by Swift: Spectral Properties and Energetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/523296
The paper
Falcone, A. D., Morris, D., Racusin, J., Chincarini, G., Moretti, A., Romano, P., Burrows, D. N., Pagani, C., Stroh, M., Grupe, D., Campana, S., Covino, S., Tagliaferri, G., Willingale, R., & Gehrels, N. (2007). The First Survey of X‐Ray Flares from Gamma‐Ray Bursts Observed by Swift: Spectral Properties and Energetics. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/523296

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.