Cited by 329Virology and Viral DiseasesImmune responses and vaccinationsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Persistence of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Antibodies in an MMR‐Vaccinated Cohort: A 20‐Year Follow‐up

Davidkin, Irja, Jokinen, Sari, Broman, Mia, Leinikki, Pauli, Peltola, Heikki·2008·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The persistence of antibodies against measles, mumps, and rubella induced by the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and the kinetics of antibody decline after the second MMR vaccine dose were studied in the same cohort for 20 years. METHODS: Measles, mumps, and rubella antibodies were measured by enzyme immunoassay in 20-year follow-up serum samples (n= 183) of twice-vaccinated individuals, and measles antibodies were also measured in oral fluids (n = 177). Antibody decay was determined in a group (n = 58) with subsequent samples collected 1, 8, and 15 years after the second MMR dose. RESULTS: In total, 95%, 74%, and 100% of 183 vaccinees were still seropositive for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively, and 85% of 177 vaccinees had measurable measles antibodies in their oral fluids. The antibody levels declined significantly after the second dose, but subsequently the rate of decline was slower. CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of seropositivity was found 20 years after the first MMR dose, particularly for rubella and measles. Our results show that MMR vaccine-induced antibodies wane significantly after the second dose. According to epidemiological data, the protection induced by MMR vaccination in Finland seems to persist at least until early adulthood. However, the situation requires constant vigilance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/528993

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For vaccines such as measles, mumps, and rubella, published studies have shown neutralizing antibody levels decline by about 5 to 10% per year.

    “Published work about many vaccines, such as those against measles, mumps, and rubella, has shown a small decrease each year of 5 to 10% in the neutralizing antibody levels.13,14”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidkin, I., Jokinen, S., Broman, M., Leinikki, P., & Peltola, H.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Davidkin, Irja
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-04
Volume
197
Issue
7
Pages
950-956
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2148441356
Cited by
329
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
MMR vaccine, antibody persistence, antibody waning, seroprevalence, measles antibodies, mumps antibodies, rubella antibodies, second vaccine dose, long-term vaccine protection, Finland
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Viral, Child, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Infant, Male, Measles, Mouth, Mumps, Rubella, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review