Machine Learning Methods Without Tears: A Primer for Ecologists
Abstract
Machine learning methods, a family of statistical techniques with origins in the field of artificial intelligence, are recognized as holding great promise for the advancement of understanding and prediction about ecological phenomena. These modeling techniques are flexible enough to handle complex problems with multiple interacting elements and typically outcompete traditional approaches (e.g., generalized linear models), making them ideal for modeling ecological systems. Despite their inherent advantages, a review of the literature reveals only a modest use of these approaches in ecology as compared to other disciplines. One potential explanation for this lack of interest is that machine learning techniques do not fall neatly into the class of statistical modeling approaches with which most ecologists are familiar. In this paper, we provide an introduction to three machine learning approaches that can be broadly used by ecologists: classification and regression trees, artificial neural networks, and evolutionary computation. For each approach, we provide a brief background to the methodology, give examples of its application in ecology, describe model development and implementation, discuss strengths and weaknesses, explore the availability of statistical software, and provide an illustrative example. Although the ecological application of machine learning approaches has increased, there remains considerable skepticism with respect to the role of these techniques in ecology.…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These types of neural networks are popular in ecology because they can approximate any continuous function.
“These types of neural networks are popular in ecology because they can approximate any continuous function (Olden et al. 2008).”
From Comparison between environmental characteristics of larval bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus habitat in the Gulf of Mexico and western Mediterranean Sea (2013) · cites this paper as Olden et al. 2008
More neurons in the hidden layer tend to improve model fit, but too many can lead to overfitting, so internal model validation is required.
“The hidden layer contains a variable number of neurons: more neurons tend to improve model fit, however too many can lead to overfitting, thus internal model validation is required (Olden et al. 2008).”
From Comparison between environmental characteristics of larval bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus habitat in the Gulf of Mexico and western Mediterranean Sea (2013) · cites this paper as Olden et al. 2008
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970 · see citing works
Random forests for classification in ecology
Cutler, D. R., Edwards, T. C., Beard, K. H., Cutler, A., Hess, K. T., Gibson, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0539.1 · Cited by 4,950 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 · Cited by 3,578 · see citing works
Use of some sensitivity criteria for choosing networks with good generalization ability
Dimopoulos, Y., Bourret, P., & Lek, S. (1995) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/bf02309007 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications for deep learning in ecology
Christin, S., Hervet, É., & Lecomte, N. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13256 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Multiple ecological pathways to extinction in mammals
Davidson, A. D., Hamilton, M. J., Boyer, A. G., Brown, J. H., & Ceballos, G. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901956106 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Predicting the conservation status of data-deficient species
Bland, L. M., Collen, B., Orme, C. D. L., & Bielby, J. (2015) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12372 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Situating Ecology as a Big-Data Science: Current Advances, Challenges, and Solutions
Farley, S. S., Dawson, A., Goring, S. J., & Williams, J. W. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy068 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Smoliński, S., & Radtke, K. (2017) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw136 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Muhling, B., Reglero, P., Ciannelli, L., Alvarez-Berastegui, D., Alemany, F., Lamkin, J., & Roffer, M. (2013) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10397 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Using machine learning to disentangle homonyms in large text corpora
Roll, U., Correia, R. A., & Berger‐Tal, O. (2018) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13044 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lin, S., Novitski, L. N., Qi, J., & Stevenson, R. J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Remote Sensing · doi:10.1117/1.jrs.12.026003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Olden, J. D., Lawler, J. J., & Poff, N. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-193
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2058731966
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 15.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Quarterly Review of Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Colorado State University
- Ministry of Natural Resources
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- machine learning, classification and regression trees, artificial neural networks, evolutionary computation, ecological modeling, ecological forecasting, statistical software, model selection, ecologists
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Decision Trees, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Fishes, Fresh Water, Models, Genetic, Software, Species Specificity, Neural Networks, Computer, Ecosystem, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review