The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Can We Learn about Neighborhood Effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment?
Open accessAbstract
Experimental estimates from Moving to Opportunity (MTO) show no significant impacts of moves to lower‐poverty neighborhoods on adult economic self‐sufficiency four to seven years after random assignment. The authors disagree with Clampet‐Lundquist and Massey's claim that MTO was a weak intervention and therefore uninformative about neighborhood effects. MTO produced large changes in neighborhood environments that improved adult mental health and many outcomes for young females. Clampet‐Lundquist and Massey's claim that MTO experimental estimates are plagued by selection bias is erroneous. Their new nonexperimental estimates are uninformative because they add back the selection problems that MTO's experimental design was intended to overcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects
Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00733.x · Cited by 2,719
Self-citationRandomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test Comment
Rubin, D. B. (1980) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287653 · Cited by 1,368
Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs
Bloom, H. S. (1984) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8400800205 · Cited by 532
Kling, J. R., Ludwig, J., & Katz, L. F. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2005.120.1.87 · Cited by 311
Self-citationRandomization as an Instrumental Variable
Heckman, J. J. (1996) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/2109936 · Cited by 87
Cited by
Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions
Bailey, Z. D., Krieger, N., Agénor, M., Graves, J., Linos, N., & Bassett, M. T. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30569-x · Cited by 5,203
Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes—a randomized social experiment.
Ludwig, J., Sanbonmatsu, L., Gennetian, L., Adam, E., Duncan, G. J., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., Lindau, S. T., Whitaker, R. C., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1103216 · Cited by 964
Self-citationNeighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults
Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224648 · Cited by 747
Self-citation(2015) · Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59531-7.00018-1 · Cited by 597
The acute effect of local homicides on children’s cognitive performance
Sharkey, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000690107 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Ludwig, J., Liebman, J. B., Kling, J. R., Duncan, G. J., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., & Sanbonmatsu, L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-188
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2114173721
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 58.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
