CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 236Political Philosophy and EthicsCritical Theory and PhilosophyLaw in Society and Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abnormal Justice

Fraser, Nancy·2008·Critical Inquiry
DOI 10.1086/589478
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/589478

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We are now living in a time of abnormal justice in which the what, the who, and the how of justice are deeply contested.

    “Fraser (2008, 2009, 2010) argues that we are now living in a time of 'abnormal justice' in which the 'what', the 'who', and the 'how' of justice are deeply contested.”

    From Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism (2017) · cites this paper as Fraser 2008

  • Justice requires social arrangements that permit all to participate as peers in social life.

    “justice requires social arrangements that permit all to participate as peers in social life”

    From Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism (2017) · cites this paper as Fraser 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. justice." But, given that expression's associations, I prefer to take my cue from Rorty and speak instead of "abnormal justice." Rorty distinguishes normal from abnormal discourse in Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, N.J., 1979) and Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge, 1989).
  3. Axel Honneth A Political-Philosophical, 2003, Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the `Postsocialist' Condition (1997)
  4. 10.1017/S0020818300004732 · DOI
  5. Arendt Hannah, 1973, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York
  6. Dworkin Ronald, 1981, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 283
  7. 10.1086/233897 · DOI
  8. Honneth Axel, 2003, Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, trans. Joel Golb, James Ingram, 110
  9. Fraser, Redistribution or Recognition?, 198
  10. Fraser, Fraser and Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition?, 7
  11. Rorty, 1991, Michigan Quarterly Review, 30, 231
  12. The, one moral-philosophical, the other socialtheoretical. From the perspective of moral philosophy, the question is: Does the proposed new interpretation of the "what
  13. Fraser, 2000, New Left Review, 3, 107
  14. Ritchie R., 2001, Ritchie and Hill, 1
  15. Guinier Lani, 1994, The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy (New York
  16. Rai Shirin M., 2002, Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World, ed. Jane L. Parpart, Rai, and Kathleen Staudt (London, 133
  17. Kymlicka Will, 1995, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford
  18. Williams Melissa, 1998, N.J.
  19. 10.1111/1467-9337.00185 · DOI
  20. Forst Rainer, 2001, Pogge, 169
  21. Rawls John, 1999, The Law of Peoples
  22. Kymlicka, 2001, N.J., 249
  23. 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 1996, Joshua Cohen, 2
  25. Singer Peter, 2004, Conn.
  26. Pogge, 2002, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms
  27. 10.1017/S0265052506060043 · DOI
  28. Fraser, 2007, Nathalie Karagiannis and Peter Wagner (Liverpool, 193
  29. The, all-subjected principle
  30. 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00060.x · DOI
  31. Ferguson James, 1999, Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt, 234
  32. Sen Amartya, 1999, Development as Freedom (New York
  33. Hardt Michael, 2000, Mass
  34. who
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00300.x · DOI
  36. Lectures Berkeley Tanner, 2006, Another Cosmopolitanism, ed. Robert Post
  37. Habermas Jürgen, 1996, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans, 10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0263276407080090 · DOI
  39. Rorty My, a 1988 essay, I noted Rorty's tendency to align abnormal discourse with "private irony
  40. Fraser, 1988, Praxis International, 8, 257
  41. Clearly, 1988, Georges Van Den Abbeele
  42. 1984, Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi
  43. Mouffe Chantal, 1999, Social Research, 66, 745
  44. 10.2307/488356 · DOI
  45. Gramsci Antonio, 1992, trans
  46. Bourdieu Pierre, 1991, Language and Symbolic Power, trans
  47. Butler Judith, 1997, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (New York
  48. Foucault Michel, 1954, Essential Works of Foucault

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fraser, N.
Corresponding author
Fraser, Nancy
Venue
Critical Inquiry
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2008-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
393-422
ISSN
  • 0093-1896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-7858
DOI
10.1086/589478
OpenAlex
W4231331466
Cited by
236
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
27.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law in Society and Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review