Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Virulence in Community‐Associated Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pulsotypes USA300 and USA400 in a Rat Model of Pneumonia

Montgomery, Christopher P., Boyle‐Vavra, Susan, Adem, Patricia V., Lee, Jean C., Husain, Aliya N., Clasen, Julia, Daum, Robert S.·2008·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The predominant genetic background of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has transitioned from USA400 to USA300 in most US communities. The explanation for this shift is unclear. We hypothesized that USA300 must be more pathogenic--specifically, that USA300 would have increased virulence when compared with USA400 in an animal model. METHODS: Rats were inoculated intratracheally with 1 of 6 S. aureus isolates from the USA300 and USA400 backgrounds. We assessed mortality, in vivo bacterial growth, and histopathology. We assessed the in vitro expression of capsule and of selected genes believed to be important in virulence in S. aureus, including agr, saeRS, sarA, alpha-toxin (hla), and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl). RESULTS: USA300 isolates were more lethal, produced more severe pneumonia, and had higher in vivo bacterial density in the lung than did USA400 isolates. In vitro expression of agr, saeRS, sarA, hla, and pvl were greater in USA300 isolates. USA300 isolates were unencapsulated, whereas 2 of 3 USA400 isolates produced capsule. CONCLUSIONS: USA300 isolates were more virulent than USA400 isolates in a model of necrotizing pneumonia. The explanation for this is unclear, but it likely results from increased expression of S. aureus regulatory systems (e.g., agr, saeRS, and sarA) and the resultant upregulation of key virulence factors including alpha-toxin and PVL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/590157

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Montgomery, C. P., Boyle‐Vavra, S., Adem, P. V., Lee, J. C., Husain, A. N., Clasen, J., & Daum, R. S.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-08-15
Volume
198
Issue
4
Pages
561-570
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2001203391
Cited by
212
References
5
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Virulence in Community‐Associated Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pulsotypes USA300 and USA400 in a Rat Model of Pneumonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/590157
The paper
Montgomery, C. P., Boyle‐Vavra, S., Adem, P. V., Lee, J. C., Husain, A. N., Clasen, J., & Daum, R. S. (2008). Comparison of Virulence in Community‐Associated Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pulsotypes USA300 and USA400 in a Rat Model of Pneumonia. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/590157

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.