The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progression to Active Tuberculosis, but Not Transmission, Varies by Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lineage in The Gambia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is considerable variability in the outcome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. We hypothesized that Mycobacterium africanum was less likely than M. tuberculosis to transmit and progress to tuberculosis disease. METHODS: In a cohort study of patients with tuberculosis and their household contacts in The Gambia, we categorized 1808 HIV-negative tuberculosis contacts according to exposure to M. tuberculosis or M. africanum. Positive skin test results indicated transmission, and development of tuberculosis during 2 years of follow-up indicated progression to disease. RESULTS: Transmission rates were similar, but rates of progression to disease were significantly lower in contacts exposed to M. africanum than in those exposed to M. tuberculosis (1.0% vs. 2.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 3.1 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.1-8.7]). Within M. tuberculosis sensu stricto, contacts exposed to a Beijing family strain were most likely to progress to disease (5.6%; HR relative to M. africanum, 6.7 [95% CI, 2.0-22]). CONCLUSIONS: M. africanum and M. tuberculosis transmit equally well to household contacts, but contacts exposed to M. africanum are less likely to progress to tuberculosis disease than those exposed to M. tuberculosis. The variable rate of progression by lineage suggests that tuberculosis variability matters in clinical settings and should be accounted for in studies evaluating tuberculosis vaccines and treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ESAT-6 proteins: protective antigens and virulence factors?
Brodin, P., Rosenkrands, I., Andersen, P., Cole, S. T., & Brosch, R. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.09.007 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Ford, C. B., Shah, R. R., Maeda, M. K., Gagneux, S., Murray, M. B., Cohen, T., Johnston, J. C., Gardy, J., Lipsitch, M., & Fortune, S. M. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2656 · Cited by 457
Self-citationRelease of mycobacterial antigens
Majlessi, L., Prados‐Rosales, R., Casadevall, A., & Brosch, R. (2015) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12251 · Cited by 93
van Crevel, R., Parwati, I., Sahiratmadja, E., Marzuki, S., Ottenhoff, T. H. M., Netea, M. G., van der Ven, A., Nelwan, R. H., van der Meer, J. W., Alisjahbana, B., et al. (2009) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/648477 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- de Jong, B. C., Hill, P. C., Aiken, A., Awine, T., Antonio, M., Adetifa, I. M., Jackson‐Sillah, D. J., Fox, A., DeRiemer, K., Gagneux, S., Borgdorff, M. W., McAdam, K. P. W. J., Corrah, T., Small, P. M., & Adegbola, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1037-1043
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2110949356
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.