The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans
Abstract
Although genomic studies suggest that natural selection in humans is ongoing, the strength of selection acting on particular characteristics in human populations has rarely been measured. Positive selection on male wealth appears to be a recurrent feature of human agrarian and pastoralist societies, and there is some evidence of it in industrial populations, too. Here we investigate the strength of selection on male wealth, first in contemporary Britain using data from the National Child Development Study and then across seven other varied human societies. The British data show positive selection on male income driven by increased childlessness among low-income men but a negative association between personal income and reproductive success for women. Across cultures, selection gradients for male wealth are weakest in industrial countries and strongest in subsistence societies with extensive polygyny. Even the weakest selection gradients observed for male wealth in humans are as strong as or stronger than selection gradients reported from field studies of other species. Thus, selection on male wealth in contemporary humans appears to be ubiquitous and substantial in strength.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This suggests that the link between status and fitness detected in modern populations (e.g.44-46), also existed in ancient populations.”
From Y-chromosome descent clusters and male differential reproductive success: young lineage expansions dominate Asian pastoral nomadic populations (2015) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution
Hawks, J., Wang, E. T., Cochran, G. M., Harpending, H. C., & Moyzis, R. K. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707650104 · Cited by 471
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1162/qjec.121.3.999 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1987.89.3.02a00050 · DOI
- Borgerhoff Mulder M., 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 255
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01357-3 · DOI
- 10.1257/089533002760278686 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00148-003-0124-7 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022050706000301 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1991.93.2.02a00040 · DOI
- 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00050-U · DOI
- Endler J. A., Natural selection in the wild
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1086/284924 · DOI
- 10.1080/19485565.2006.9989118 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.161281098 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004 · DOI
- Irons W., Cultural and biological success. Pages 257–272 in N
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00559.x · DOI
- 10.1086/203235 · DOI
- Keizer R., 2007, Journal of Biosocial Science, 35, 213
- 10.1086/319193 · DOI
- 10.2307/2095464 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00021-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90017-2 · DOI
- Nakosteen R. A., 1997, Social Science Quarterly, 78, 66
- 10.1348/000712603322503097 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X00029939 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0543 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2006.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/0162-3095(92)90012-S · DOI
- 10.1007/s12110-004-1013-9 · DOI
- van den Berghe P. L., 1990, International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 27, 29
- 10.1017/S0140525X00021968 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040446 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00174026 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0509691102 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12110-006-1001-3 · DOI
Cited by
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001356 · Cited by 934
Bateman's principles and human sex roles
Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Mulder, M. B. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005 · Cited by 295
Personality and reproductive success in a high-fertility human population
Alvergne, A., Jokela, M., & Lummaa, V. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1001752107 · Cited by 181
Zeng, T. C., Aw, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 · Cited by 121
Balaresque, P., Poulet, N., Cussat-Blanc, S., Gerard, P., Quintana-Murci, L., Heyer, E., & Jobling, M. A. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.285 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. V.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 658-666
- ISSN
- 0003-0147
- 1537-5323
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review