The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using Internet Searches for Influenza Surveillance
Open accessAbstract
The Internet is an important source of health information. Thus, the frequency of Internet searches may provide information regarding infectious disease activity. As an example, we examined the relationship between searches for influenza and actual influenza occurrence. Using search queries from the Yahoo! search engine ( http://search.yahoo.com ) from March 2004 through May 2008, we counted daily unique queries originating in the United States that contained influenza-related search terms. Counts were divided by the total number of searches, and the resulting daily fraction of searches was averaged over the week. We estimated linear models, using searches with 1-10-week lead times as explanatory variables to predict the percentage of cultures positive for influenza and deaths attributable to pneumonia and influenza in the United States. With use of the frequency of searches, our models predicted an increase in cultures positive for influenza 1-3 weeks in advance of when they occurred (P < .001), and similar models predicted an increase in mortality attributable to pneumonia and influenza up to 5 weeks in advance (P < .001). Search-term surveillance may provide an additional tool for disease surveillance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data
Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07634 · Cited by 4,295
Predicting the Present with Google Trends
CHOI, H., & VARIAN, H. (2012) · Economic Record · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00809.x · Cited by 2,354
Eysenbach, G. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1157 · Cited by 1,351
Digital disease detection - harnessing the Web for public health surveillance
Brownstein, J. S., Freifeld, C. C., & Madoff, L. C. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp0900702 · Cited by 819
Predicting consumer behavior with web search
Goel, S., Hofman, J. M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005962107 · Cited by 636
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Polgreen, P. M., Chen, Y., Pennock, D. M., & Nelson, F. D.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1443-1448
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2151932005
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Internet Searches for Influenza Surveillance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/593098
- The paper
- Polgreen, P. M., Chen, Y., Pennock, D. M., & Nelson, F. D. (2008). Using Internet Searches for Influenza Surveillance. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/593098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.