Cited by 4,295Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceInfluenza Virus Research StudiesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data

Open access
Ginsberg, Jeremy, Mohebbi, Matthew H., Patel, Rajan S., Brammer, Lynnette, Smolinski, Mark S., Brilliant, Larry·2009·Nature

Abstract

Seasonal influenza epidemics are a major public health concern, causing tens of millions of respiratory illnesses and 250,000 to 500,000 deaths worldwide each year. In addition to seasonal influenza, a new strain of influenza virus against which no previous immunity exists and that demonstrates human-to-human transmission could result in a pandemic with millions of fatalities. Early detection of disease activity, when followed by a rapid response, can reduce the impact of both seasonal and pandemic influenza. One way to improve early detection is to monitor health-seeking behaviour in the form of queries to online search engines, which are submitted by millions of users around the world each day. Here we present a method of analysing large numbers of Google search queries to track influenza-like illness in a population. Because the relative frequency of certain queries is highly correlated with the percentage of physician visits in which a patient presents with influenza-like symptoms, we can accurately estimate the current level of weekly influenza activity in each region of the United States, with a reporting lag of about one day. This approach may make it possible to use search queries to detect influenza epidemics in areas with a large population of web search users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07634

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Mohebbi, Matthew H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-02
Volume
457
Issue
7232
Pages
1012-1014
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2117239687
Cited by
4,295
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 120 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 265 · 2021: 335 · 2020: 393 · 2019: 278 · 2018: 298 · 2017: 299 · 2016: 355 · 2015: 334 · 2014: 375 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 192
FWCI
81.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
influenza surveillance, influenza-like illness, Google Flu Trends, search engine query data, real-time disease surveillance, health-seeking behavior, internet search data, pandemic influenza
MeSH terms
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Health Education, Humans, Influenza, Human, Office Visits, Population Surveillance, Seasons, Time Factors, United States, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior, Linear Models, Databases, Factual, Internet, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review