Cited by 176Physiological and biochemical adaptationsAmphibian and Reptile BiologyVenomous Animal Envenomation and Studies

Determinants of the Postfeeding Metabolic Response of Burmese Pythons, Python molurus

Secor, Stephen M., Diamond, Jared·1997·Physiological Zoology

Abstract

The relatively large meal sizes consumed by sit-and-wait-foraging snake species make them favorable for investigating specific dynamic action, the rise in metabolic rate associated with digestion. Hence, we measured O2 consumption rates (VO2) before and up to 20 d after Burmese pythons (Python molurus) either had only constricted and killed rodent meals or had also been allowed to consume meals ranging in size from 5% to 111% of their body mass. Postprandial VO2 peaked within 2 d at a value that increased with meal size, up to 44 times standard metabolic rate for the largest meals. In addition to being the largest known magnitude of postprandial metabolic response, this also exceeds the factorial increase in VO2 during peak physical activity for all studied animals except perhaps racehorses. Specific dynamic action, calculated from the extra VO2 above standard metabolic rate over the duration of digestion, increased with meal size and equaled 32% of ingested meal energy. The allometric exponent for body mass was 0.68 for standard metabolic rate, 0.90 for peak postprandial VO2, and 1.01 for specific dynamic action. Specific dynamic action is higher, and standard metabolic rate is lower, in sit-and-wait-foraging snake species than in actively foraging snake species. This suggests that sit-and-wait-foraging snakes, which consume large meals at long and unpredictable intervals, reduce standard metabolic rate by allowing the energetically expensive small intestine and other associ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/639578

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The peak factorial increase in metabolism following feeding (=RMR_pp/BMR) is positively correlated with body mass in mammals.

    “The peak factorial increase in metabolism following feeding (=RMR pp /BMR) is therefore positively correlated with body mass in mammals, as has been documented intraspecifically for Burmese pythons Python molurus (Secor and Diamond, 1997) and cane toads Bufo marinus (Secor and Faulkner, 2002).”

    From Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism (2005) · cites this paper as Secor and Diamond, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Secor, S. M., & Diamond, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Physiological Zoology
Published
1997-03
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
202-212
ISSN
0031-935X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2233039892
Cited by
176
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiological Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32dk008878-03)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-14772)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 08878)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Keywords
Burmese python, Python molurus, specific dynamic action, meal size, sit-and-wait foraging, standard metabolic rate, allometric scaling, oxygen consumption
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Digestion, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Oxygen Consumption, Time Factors, Boidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review