Cited by 484Anthropological Studies and InsightsPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Deleuze and the Anthropology of Becoming

Biehl, João, Locke, Peter·2010·Current Anthropology

Abstract

Philosopher Gilles Deleuze emphasizes the primacy of desire over power and the openness and flux of social fields. In this article, we place our ethnographic projects among the urban poor in Brazil and Bosnia‐Herzegovina in dialogue with Deleuze’s cartographic approach to subjectivity and his reflections on control and the transformative potential of becoming. As people scavenge for resources and care, they must deal with the encroachment of psychiatric diagnostics and treatments in broken public institutions and in altered forms of common sense. By reading our cases in light of Deleuze’s ideas, we uphold the rights of microanalysis, bringing into view the immanent fields that people, in all their ambiguity, invent and live by. Such fields of action and significance—leaking out on all sides—are mediated by power and knowledge, but they are also animated by claims to basic rights and desires. In making public a nuanced understanding of these fields—always at risk of disappearing—anthropologists still allow for larger structural and institutional processes to become visible and their true effect known. This fieldwork/philosophical dialogue highlights the limits of psychiatric models of symptoms and human agency and supplements applications of concepts such as biopolitics, structural violence, and social suffering in anthropology. Continually adjusting itself to the reality of contemporary lives and worlds, the anthropological venture has the potential of art: to invoke neglecte…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/651466

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sarah's case demonstrates how persons persistently exceed the ways in which law, humanitarian aid, and ethnographic practice seek to assess and codify, even under inexorable conditions of inequality.

    “Sarah’s case demonstrates how persons persistently exceed the ways in which law, humanitarian aid, and ethnographic practice seek to assess and codify, even under inexorable conditions of inequality (Biehl and Locke 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biehl, J., & Locke, P.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2010-06
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
317-351
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2152723912
Cited by
484
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 13
FWCI
74.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
Gilles Deleuze, becoming, desire, control, urban poverty, psychiatric diagnosis, mental health services, microanalysis, biopolitics, structural violence, social suffering, human agency, power and knowledge, Brazil, Bosnia and Herzegovina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review