The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gross Job Creation and Destruction: Microeconomic Evidence and Macroeconomic Implications
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the connection between the heterogeneity of establishment-level employment changes and aggregate fluctuations at business cycle frequencies. Our empirical work exploits a rich data set with approximately 860,000 annual observations and 3.4 million quarterly observations on 160,000 manufacturing establishments to calculate rates of gross job creation, gross job destruction, and their sum, gross job reallocation. Three central messages emerge from the research in this paper: First, establishment-level employment changes exhibit tremendous heterogeneity, even within narrowly defined sectors of the economy. This heterogeneity manifests itself in terms of high rates of gross job creation, destruction, and reallocation. Furthermore, the magnitude of this heterogeneity varies significantly over time; most of the variation is due to time variation in the idiosyncratic component of establishment growth rates, and the variation is significantly countercyclical. Second, our theoretical model of employment reallocation and business cycles is suggestive of how both aggregate and allocative disturbances can drive fluctuations in job creation, job destruction, unemployment, productivity, and output. Third, our empirical analysis of the joint dynamics of job creation and destruction supports the view that allocative disturbances were a major driving force behind movements in job creation, job destruction, job reallocation, and net employment growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector during the 1972 to 1986 period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Growth of Earnings Instability in the U.S. Labor Market
Gottschalk, P., Moffitt, R., Katz, L. F., & Dickens, W. T. (1994) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534657 · Cited by 760
Recessions and the Costs of Job Loss
Davis, S. J., & von Wachter, T. (2011) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2011.0016 · Cited by 533
Self-citationThe Flow Approach to Labor Markets: New Data Sources and Micro–Macro Links
Davis, S. J., Faberman, R. J., & Haltiwanger, J. (2006) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.20.3.3 · Cited by 429
Self-citationBak, P., Chen, K., Scheinkman, J., & Woodford, M. (1993) · Ricerche Economiche · doi:10.1016/0035-5054(93)90023-v · Cited by 328
Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market
Layard, R., Nickell, S., & Jackman, R. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279166.001.0001 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, S. J., & Haltiwanger, J.
- Venue
- NBER Macroeconomics Annual
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 123-168
- ISSN
- 0889-3365 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2642
- OpenAlex
- W2095448826
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gross Job Creation and Destruction: Microeconomic Evidence and Macroeconomic Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/654135
- The paper
- Davis, S. J., & Haltiwanger, J. (1990). Gross Job Creation and Destruction: Microeconomic Evidence and Macroeconomic Implications. NBER Macroeconomics Annual. https://doi.org/10.1086/654135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.